Cited by 104Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesCognitive Functions and Memory

Cooperation between the hippocampus and the striatum during episodic encoding

Sadeh, Talya, Shohamy, Daphna, Levy, Dana Rubi, Reggev, Niv, Maril, Anat·2011·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

The hippocampus and the striatum are thought to play distinct roles in learning and memory, each supporting an independent memory system. A fundamental question is whether, and how, these systems interact to jointly contribute to learning and memory. In particular, it remains unknown whether the striatum contributes selectively to implicit, habitual learning, or whether the striatum may also contribute to long-term episodic memory. Here, we show with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) that the hippocampus and the striatum interact cooperatively to support episodic memory formation. Participants were scanned during a memory encoding paradigm and, subsequently, were tested for memory of encoded items. fMRI data revealed that successful memory was associated with greater activity in both the hippocampus and the striatum (putamen) during encoding. Furthermore, activity in the hippocampus and the striatum was correlated within subjects for items that were later remembered, but not for items that were forgotten. Finally, across subjects, the strength of the correlation between the hippocampus and the striatum predicted memory success. These findings provide novel evidence for contributions of both the striatum and the hippocampus to successful episodic encoding and for a cooperative interaction between them.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/jocn.2010.21549

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Similar cooperation between memory systems was previously identified during an episodic encoding task.

    “Similar cooperation between memory systems was previously identified during an episodic encoding task (Sadeh et al., 2011).”

    From Neural Correlates of Long-Term Memory Enhancement Following Retrieval Practice (2021) · cites this paper as Sadeh et al., 2011

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 87 · Cited by 104

Authors
Sadeh, T., Shohamy, D., Levy, D. R., Reggev, N., & Maril, A.
Affiliations
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • 2Columbia University, New York, NY
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Publisher
MIT Press
Published
2011-07-01
Volume
23
Issue
7
Pages
1597-1608
ISSN
  • 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8898
OpenAlex
W1976297334
Cited by
104
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Israel Science Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
hippocampus, striatum, putamen, episodic memory, memory encoding, memory consolidation, habit learning, interindividual variability
MeSH terms
Adult, Antigens, Viral, Brain Mapping, Corpus Striatum, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Learning, Male, Neural Pathways, Mental Recall, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review