Cooperation between the hippocampus and the striatum during episodic encoding
Abstract
The hippocampus and the striatum are thought to play distinct roles in learning and memory, each supporting an independent memory system. A fundamental question is whether, and how, these systems interact to jointly contribute to learning and memory. In particular, it remains unknown whether the striatum contributes selectively to implicit, habitual learning, or whether the striatum may also contribute to long-term episodic memory. Here, we show with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) that the hippocampus and the striatum interact cooperatively to support episodic memory formation. Participants were scanned during a memory encoding paradigm and, subsequently, were tested for memory of encoded items. fMRI data revealed that successful memory was associated with greater activity in both the hippocampus and the striatum (putamen) during encoding. Furthermore, activity in the hippocampus and the striatum was correlated within subjects for items that were later remembered, but not for items that were forgotten. Finally, across subjects, the strength of the correlation between the hippocampus and the striatum predicted memory success. These findings provide novel evidence for contributions of both the striatum and the hippocampus to successful episodic encoding and for a cooperative interaction between them.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Similar cooperation between memory systems was previously identified during an episodic encoding task.
“Similar cooperation between memory systems was previously identified during an episodic encoding task (Sadeh et al., 2011).”
From Neural Correlates of Long-Term Memory Enhancement Following Retrieval Practice (2021) · cites this paper as Sadeh et al., 2011
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 87 · Cited by 104
- Authors
- Sadeh, T., Shohamy, D., Levy, D. R., Reggev, N., & Maril, A.
- Affiliations
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- 2Columbia University, New York, NY
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- Venue
- Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
- Publisher
- MIT Press
- Published
- 2011-07-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1597-1608
- ISSN
- 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8898
- OpenAlex
- W1976297334
- Cited by
- 104
- References
- 87
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 5.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Israel Science Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- hippocampus, striatum, putamen, episodic memory, memory encoding, memory consolidation, habit learning, interindividual variability
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Antigens, Viral, Brain Mapping, Corpus Striatum, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Learning, Male, Neural Pathways, Mental Recall, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review