Cited by 101Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Protecting the self: The effect of social-evaluative threat on neural representations of self

Hughes, Brent L., Beer, Jennifer S.·2013·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

One of the most robust ways that people protect themselves from social-evaluative threat is by emphasizing the desirability of their personal characteristics, yet the neural underpinnings of this fundamental process are unknown. The current fMRI study addresses this question by examining self-evaluations of desirability (in comparison with other people) as a response to threat. Participants judged how much personality traits described themselves in comparison with their average peer. These judgments were preceded by threatening or nonthreatening social-evaluative feedback. Self-evaluations made in response to threat significantly increased activation in a number of regions including the OFC, medial pFC, lateral pFC, amygdala, and insula. Individual differences in the extent to which threat increased desirability were significantly correlated with medial OFC activity. This is the first study to examine the neural associations of a fundamental self-protection strategy: responding to threat by emphasizing the self's desirability. Although neural research has separately examined self-evaluation processes from the regulation of social-evaluative threat, little is known about the interplay between the two. The findings build on this previous research by showing that regions, often associated with self-evaluation, are modulated by the degree to which people respond to threat by emphasizing their own desirability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/jocn_a_00343

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When faced with threats to the self, such as failure or social rejection, adults exhibit compensatory behaviors that help them buffer and enhance their self-views.

    “When faced with threats to the self, such as feedback of failure or social rejection, adults exhibit compensatory behaviors that help them buffer and enhance their self-views (4–6).”
  • Healthy adults maintain inherently positive or inflated self-views and report having more positive and less negative attributes than others (above average effect).

    “These findings align with previous work positing that healthy adults maintain inherently positive or inflated self-views (4, 32) and report having more positive and less negative attributes than others, known as the “above average effect” (6, 33).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 90 · Cited by 101

Authors
Hughes, B. L., & Beer, J. S.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Publisher
MIT Press
Published
2013-04-01
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
613-622
ISSN
  • 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8898
OpenAlex
W2149584177
Cited by
101
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
social-evaluative threat, self-protection, self-assessment, personality traits, threat response, medial orbitofrontal cortex, amygdala, insula, prefrontal cortex, individual differences, self-representation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Brain, Brain Mapping, Emotions, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Individuality, Judgment, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Oxygen, Personality, Photic Stimulation, Self Concept, Social Desirability, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review