Protecting the self: The effect of social-evaluative threat on neural representations of self
Abstract
One of the most robust ways that people protect themselves from social-evaluative threat is by emphasizing the desirability of their personal characteristics, yet the neural underpinnings of this fundamental process are unknown. The current fMRI study addresses this question by examining self-evaluations of desirability (in comparison with other people) as a response to threat. Participants judged how much personality traits described themselves in comparison with their average peer. These judgments were preceded by threatening or nonthreatening social-evaluative feedback. Self-evaluations made in response to threat significantly increased activation in a number of regions including the OFC, medial pFC, lateral pFC, amygdala, and insula. Individual differences in the extent to which threat increased desirability were significantly correlated with medial OFC activity. This is the first study to examine the neural associations of a fundamental self-protection strategy: responding to threat by emphasizing the self's desirability. Although neural research has separately examined self-evaluation processes from the regulation of social-evaluative threat, little is known about the interplay between the two. The findings build on this previous research by showing that regions, often associated with self-evaluation, are modulated by the degree to which people respond to threat by emphasizing their own desirability.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
When faced with threats to the self, such as failure or social rejection, adults exhibit compensatory behaviors that help them buffer and enhance their self-views.
“When faced with threats to the self, such as feedback of failure or social rejection, adults exhibit compensatory behaviors that help them buffer and enhance their self-views (4–6).”
From Development of self-protective biases in response to social evaluative feedback (2017) · cites this paper as [6]
Healthy adults maintain inherently positive or inflated self-views and report having more positive and less negative attributes than others (above average effect).
“These findings align with previous work positing that healthy adults maintain inherently positive or inflated self-views (4, 32) and report having more positive and less negative attributes than others, known as the “above average effect” (6, 33).”
From Development of self-protective biases in response to social evaluative feedback (2017) · cites this paper as [6]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 90 · Cited by 101
- Authors
- Hughes, B. L., & Beer, J. S.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
- Publisher
- MIT Press
- Published
- 2013-04-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 613-622
- ISSN
- 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8898
- OpenAlex
- W2149584177
- Cited by
- 101
- References
- 90
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- social-evaluative threat, self-protection, self-assessment, personality traits, threat response, medial orbitofrontal cortex, amygdala, insula, prefrontal cortex, individual differences, self-representation
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Brain, Brain Mapping, Emotions, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Individuality, Judgment, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Oxygen, Personality, Photic Stimulation, Self Concept, Social Desirability, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review