Cited by 44Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural dynamics and brain function

Prefrontal Goal Codes Emerge as Latent States in Probabilistic Value Learning

Open access
Stoianov, Ivilin, Genovesio, Aldo, Pezzulo, Giovanni·2016·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

The prefrontal cortex (PFC) supports goal-directed actions and exerts cognitive control over behavior, but the underlying coding and mechanism are heavily debated. We present evidence for the role of goal coding in PFC from two converging perspectives: computational modeling and neuronal-level analysis of monkey data. We show that neural representations of prospective goals emerge by combining a categorization process that extracts relevant behavioral abstractions from the input data and a reward-driven process that selects candidate categories depending on their adaptive value; both forms of learning have a plausible neural implementation in PFC. Our analyses demonstrate a fundamental principle: goal coding represents an efficient solution to cognitive control problems, analogous to efficient coding principles in other (e.g., visual) brain areas. The novel analytical–computational approach is of general interest because it applies to a variety of neurophysiological studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/jocn_a_00886

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 64 · Cited by 44

Authors
Stoianov, I., Genovesio, A., & Pezzulo, G.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • National Research Council (IT)
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Published
2016-01-01
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
140-157
ISSN
  • 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8898
OpenAlex
W1821682412
Cited by
44
References
64
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 3
FWCI
6.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Nvidia
  • European Commission (622882, 270108)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
prefrontal cortex, hidden states, cognitive control, goal-directed behavior, efficient coding, rhesus monkeys
MeSH terms
Animals, Haplorhini, Computer Simulation, Discrimination, Psychological, Goals, Male, Models, Neurological, Photic Stimulation, Probability Learning, Psychometrics, Reward, Visual Perception, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review