Cited by 15Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesPsychological and Educational Research Studies

A neural correlate of strategic exploration at the onset of adolescence

Open access
Kayser, Andrew S., Op de Macks, Zdeňa, Dahl, Ronald E., Frank, Michael J.·2016·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

The onset of adolescence is associated with an increase in the behavioral tendency to explore and seek novel experiences. However, this exploration has rarely been quantified, and its neural correlates during this period remain unclear. Previously, activity within specific regions of the rostrolateral PFC (rlPFC) in adults has been shown to correlate with the tendency for exploration. Here we investigate a recently developed task to assess individual differences in strategic exploration, defined as the degree to which the relative uncertainty of rewards directs responding toward less well-evaluated choices, in 62 girls aged 11-13 years from whom resting state fMRI data were obtained in a separate session. Behaviorally, this task divided our participants into groups of explorers (n = 41) and nonexplorers (n = 21). When seed ROIs within the rlPFC were used to interrogate resting state fMRI data, we identified a lateralized connection between the rlPFC and posterior putamen/insula whose strength differentiated explorers from nonexplorers. On the basis of Granger causality analyses, the preponderant direction of influence may proceed from posterior to anterior. Together, these data provide initial evidence concerning the neural basis of exploratory tendencies at the onset of adolescence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/jocn_a_00896

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a focused sample of girls aged 11-13, no association was found between age or pubertal development and propensity for strategic exploration.

    “Within a focused sample of girls ranging from 11–13 years, no association was found between age or pubertal development and propensity for strategic exploration (Kayser et al., 2015).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 15

Authors
Kayser, A. S., Op de Macks, Z., Dahl, R. E., & Frank, M. J.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • 3University of California, Berkeley
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Brown University (US)
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Published
2016-02-01
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
199-209
ISSN
  • 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8898
OpenAlex
W1751872998
Cited by
15
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Educational Research Studies
Keywords
strategic exploration, adolescence, rostrolateral prefrontal cortex, resting-state functional connectivity, posterior putamen, posterior insula, individual differences, reward uncertainty, Granger causality
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Brain, Brain Mapping, Child, Choice Behavior, Exploratory Behavior, Female, Humans, Individuality, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neural Pathways, Neuropsychological Tests, Reaction Time, Rest, Reward, Multivariate Analysis, Uncertainty, Adolescent Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review