The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
V-Raising and Grammar Competition in Korean: Evidence from Negation and Quantifier Scope
Abstract
In a head-final language, V-raising is hard to detect since there is no evidence from the string to support a raising analysis. If the language has a cliticlike negation that associates with the verb in syntax, then scope facts concerning negation and a quantified object NP could provide evidence regarding the height of the verb. Even so, such facts are rare, especially in the input to children, and so we might expect that not all speakers exposed to a head-final language acquire the same grammar as far as V-raising is concerned. Here, we present evidence supporting this expectation. Using experimental data concerning the scope of quantified NPs and negation in Korean, elicited from both adults and 4-year-old children, we show that there are two populations of Korean speakers: one with V-raising and one without.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ASPECTS OF THE THEORY OF SYNTAX
Chomsky, N. (1964) · doi:10.21236/ad0616323 · Cited by 13,587
Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures
Chomsky, N. (1993) · Mouton eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110884166 · Cited by 8,541
Verb Movement, Universal Grammar, and the Structure of IP, 1989
(2013) · An Annotated Syntax Reader ‐ Lasting Insights and Questions · doi:10.1002/9781394260140.ch15 · Cited by 3,458
Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change
Kroch, A. S. (1989) · Language Variation and Change · doi:10.1017/s0954394500000168 · Cited by 1,620
Kim, K., Akatsuka, N., Iwasaki, S., & Strauss, S. (1999) · Language · doi:10.2307/417739 · Cited by 1,383
Scalar implicatures: experiments at the semantics–pragmatics interface
Papafragou, A., & Musolino, J. (2003) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00179-8 · Cited by 783
Self-citationSome asymmetries in Japanese and their theoretical implications
Saitō, M. (1985) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 650
Knowledge and Learning in Natural Language
Yang, C. (2012) · Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_837 · Cited by 479
Whether We Agree or Not: A Comparative Syntax of English and Japanese
Kuroda, S.-Y. (1992) · Studies in natural language and linguistic theory · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-2789-9_11 · Cited by 447
Roeper, T. (1999) · Bilingualism: Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728999000310 · Cited by 341
Cited by
The Acquisition of Heritage Languages
Montrul, S. (2015) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139030502 · Cited by 900
Metadata
- Authors
- Han, C.-H., Lidz, J., & Musolino, J.
- Venue
- Linguistic Inquiry
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-47
- ISSN
- 0024-3892 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-9150
- OpenAlex
- W2074519264
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 75.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: V-Raising and Grammar Competition in Korean: Evidence from Negation and Quantifier Scope. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/ling.2007.38.1.1
- The paper
- Han, C.-H., Lidz, J., & Musolino, J. (2007). V-Raising and Grammar Competition in Korean: Evidence from Negation and Quantifier Scope. Linguistic Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2007.38.1.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
