Training with Noise is Equivalent to Tikhonov Regularization
Abstract
It is well known that the addition of noise to the input data of a neural network during training can, in some circumstances, lead to significant improvements in generalization performance. Previous work has shown that such training with noise is equivalent to a form of regularization in which an extra term is added to the error function. However, the regularization term, which involves second derivatives of the error function, is not bounded below, and so can lead to difficulties if used directly in a learning algorithm based on error minimization. In this paper we show that for the purposes of network training, the regularization term can be reduced to a positive semi-definite form that involves only first derivatives of the network mapping. For a sum-of-squares error function, the regularization term belongs to the class of generalized Tikhonov regularizers. Direct minimization of the regularized error function provides a practical alternative to training with noise.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Lower noise data is not necessarily better, and adding noise to training data might in some instances improve performance.
“Therefore, lower noise data is not necessarily better and adding noise to the training data might in some instances even improve performance200–202.”
From The METRIC-framework for assessing data quality for trustworthy AI in medicine: A systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [200]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 31 · Cited by 1,325
- Authors
- Bishop, C. M.
- Affiliations
- Aston University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Bishop, Chris M.
- Venue
- Neural Computation
- Publisher
- MIT Press
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 108-116
- ISSN
- 0899-7667 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-888X
- OpenAlex
- W2111406701
- Cited by
- 1,325
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 116 · 2025: 82 · 2024: 115 · 2023: 110 · 2022: 103 · 2021: 123 · 2020: 113 · 2019: 80 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 13.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neural Computation (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and ELM
- Keywords
- Tikhonov regularization, neural network training, generalization, error reduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review