Cited by 1,325Neural Networks and ApplicationsStochastic Gradient Optimization TechniquesMachine Learning and ELM

Training with Noise is Equivalent to Tikhonov Regularization

Bishop, Chris M.·1995·Neural Computation

Abstract

It is well known that the addition of noise to the input data of a neural network during training can, in some circumstances, lead to significant improvements in generalization performance. Previous work has shown that such training with noise is equivalent to a form of regularization in which an extra term is added to the error function. However, the regularization term, which involves second derivatives of the error function, is not bounded below, and so can lead to difficulties if used directly in a learning algorithm based on error minimization. In this paper we show that for the purposes of network training, the regularization term can be reduced to a positive semi-definite form that involves only first derivatives of the network mapping. For a sum-of-squares error function, the regularization term belongs to the class of generalized Tikhonov regularizers. Direct minimization of the regularized error function provides a practical alternative to training with noise.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/neco.1995.7.1.108

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 31 · Cited by 1,325

Authors
Bishop, C. M.
Affiliations
Aston University (GB)
Corresponding author
Bishop, Chris M.
Venue
Neural Computation
Publisher
MIT Press
Published
1995-01
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
108-116
ISSN
  • 0899-7667 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-888X
OpenAlex
W2111406701
Cited by
1,325
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 116 · 2025: 82 · 2024: 115 · 2023: 110 · 2022: 103 · 2021: 123 · 2020: 113 · 2019: 80 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 20
FWCI
13.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Neural Computation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and ELM
Keywords
Tikhonov regularization, neural network training, generalization, error reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review