The Effects of Adding Noise During Backpropagation Training on a Generalization Performance
Abstract
We study the effects of adding noise to the inputs, outputs, weight connections, and weight changes of multilayer feedforward neural networks during backpropagation training. We rigorously derive and analyze the objective functions that are minimized by the noise-affected training processes. We show that input noise and weight noise encourage the neural-network output to be a smooth function of the input or its weights, respectively. In the weak-noise limit, noise added to the output of the neural networks only changes the objective function by a constant. Hence, it cannot improve generalization. Input noise introduces penalty terms in the objective function that are related to, but distinct from, those found in the regularization approaches. Simulations have been performed on a regression and a classification problem to further substantiate our analysis. Input noise is found to be effective in improving the generalization performance for both problems. However, weight noise is found to be effective in improving the generalization performance only for the classification problem. Other forms of noise have practically no effect on generalization.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Adding Gaussian noise to the transformer embedded features during training is a form of data augmentation and regularization that biases towards smooth functions.
“Adding noise during training is seen as a form of data augmentation and regularization that biases towards smooth functions [10], [31].”
From VT-ADL: A Vision Transformer Network for Image Anomaly Detection and Localization (2021) · cites this paper as [31]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 34 · Cited by 475
- Authors
- An, G.
- Affiliations
- Shell (Netherlands) (NL)
- Corresponding author
- An, Guozhong
- Venue
- Neural Computation
- Publisher
- MIT Press
- Published
- 1996-04
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 643-674
- ISSN
- 0899-7667 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-888X
- OpenAlex
- W2124136621
- Cited by
- 475
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 3.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neural Computation (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and ELM
- Keywords
- noise injection, backpropagation training, generalization, multilayer perceptron, input noise, output noise, weak noise limit, regularization, regression analysis, classification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review