The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nonnegative Matrix Factorization with the Itakura-Saito Divergence: With Application to Music Analysis
Abstract
This letter presents theoretical, algorithmic, and experimental results about nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) with the Itakura-Saito (IS) divergence. We describe how IS-NMF is underlaid by a well-defined statistical model of superimposed gaussian components and is equivalent to maximum likelihood estimation of variance parameters. This setting can accommodate regularization constraints on the factors through Bayesian priors. In particular, inverse-gamma and gamma Markov chain priors are considered in this work. Estimation can be carried out using a space-alternating generalized expectation-maximization (SAGE) algorithm; this leads to a novel type of NMF algorithm, whose convergence to a stationary point of the IS cost function is guaranteed. We also discuss the links between the IS divergence and other cost functions used in NMF, in particular, the Euclidean distance and the generalized Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence. As such, we describe how IS-NMF can also be performed using a gradient multiplicative algorithm (a standard algorithm structure in NMF) whose convergence is observed in practice, though not proven. Finally, we report a furnished experimental comparative study of Euclidean-NMF, KL-NMF, and IS-NMF algorithms applied to the power spectrogram of a short piano sequence recorded in real conditions, with various initializations and model orders. Then we show how IS-NMF can successfully be employed for denoising and upmix (mono to stereo conversion) of an original piece of early jazz music. These experiments indicate that IS-NMF correctly captures the semantics of audio and is better suited to the representation of music signals than NMF with the usual Euclidean and KL costs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19
(2007) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.52202/085713 · Cited by 15,539
Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization
Lee, D. D., & Seung, H. S. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/44565 · Cited by 13,868
ALGORITHMS FOR NON-NEGATIVE MATRIX FACTORIZATION
Lee, D. D., & Seung, H. S. (2000) · Cited by 7,952
ALGORITHMS FOR NON-NEGATIVE MATRIX FACTORIZATION
Seung, D., & Lee, L.-W. (2001) · Cited by 4,753
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 18
Murray, I., Mackay, D., Zoubin Ghahramani, A., & Skilling, J. (2006) · Cited by 1,927
Projected Gradient Methods for Nonnegative Matrix Factorization
Lin, C.-J. (2007) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2007.19.10.2756 · Cited by 1,737
Algorithms and applications for approximate nonnegative matrix factorization
Berry, M. W., Browne, M., Langville, A. N., Pauca, V. P., & Plemmons, R. J. (2007) · Computational Statistics & Data Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.csda.2006.11.006 · Cited by 1,512
Stoica, P., & Selen, Y. (2004) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2004.1311138 · Cited by 1,358
Learning Overcomplete Representations
Lewicki, M. S., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2000) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976600300015826 · Cited by 1,129
Space-alternating generalized expectation-maximization algorithm
Fessler, J. A., & Hero, A. O. (1994) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/78.324732 · Cited by 1,063
Cited by
Modelling and analysis of local field potentials for studying the function of cortical circuits
Einevoll, G. T., Kayser, C., Logothetis, N. K., & Panzeri, S. (2013) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3599 · Cited by 857
Multichannel Nonnegative Matrix Factorization in Convolutive Mixtures for Audio Source Separation
Ozerov, A., & Fevotte, C. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/tasl.2009.2031510 · Cited by 607
Kim, J., He, Y., & Park, H. (2014) · Journal of Global Optimization · doi:10.1007/s10898-013-0035-4 · Cited by 352
Online Nonnegative Matrix Factorization With Robust Stochastic Approximation
Guan, N., Tao, D., Luo, Z., & Yuan, B. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2012.2197827 · Cited by 287
Geng, M., Xie, X., Ye, Z., Wang, T., Li, G., Hu, S., Liu, X., & Meng, H. (2022) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2022.3195113 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Févotte, C., Bertin, N., & Durrieu, J.-L.
- Venue
- Neural Computation
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 2009-03
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 793-830
- ISSN
- 0899-7667 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-888X
- OpenAlex
- W2039844283
- Cited by
- 1,119
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 69.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nonnegative Matrix Factorization with the Itakura-Saito Divergence: With Application to Music Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/neco.2008.04-08-771
- The paper
- Févotte, C., Bertin, N., & Durrieu, J.-L. (2009). Nonnegative Matrix Factorization with the Itakura-Saito Divergence: With Application to Music Analysis. Neural Computation. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.2008.04-08-771
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.