Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 38Neural Networks and ApplicationsBayesian Modeling and Causal InferenceMachine Learning and Algorithms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Universal Approximation Depth and Errors of Narrow Belief Networks with Discrete Units

Montúfar, Guido F.·2014·Neural Computation

Abstract

We generalize recent theoretical work on the minimal number of layers of narrow deep belief networks that can approximate any probability distribution on the states of their visible units arbitrarily well. We relax the setting of binary units (Sutskever & Hinton, 2008 ; Le Roux & Bengio, 2008 , 2010 ; Montúfar & Ay, 2011 ) to units with arbitrary finite state spaces and the vanishing approximation error to an arbitrary approximation error tolerance. For example, we show that a q-ary deep belief network with L > or = 2 + (q[m-delta]-1 / (q-1)) layers of width n < or = + log(q) (m) + 1 for some [Formula : see text] can approximate any probability distribution on {0, 1, ... , q-1}n without exceeding a Kullback-Leibler divergence of delta. Our analysis covers discrete restricted Boltzmann machines and naive Bayes models as special cases.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/neco_a_00601

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Ay N., 2006, Kybernetika, 42, 517
  2. Long P. M., 2010, Proceedings of the 27th ICML, 703
  3. Montúfar G., 2013, Kybernetika, 49, 23
  4. Montúfar G., 2012, Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Uncertainty Processing, 137
  5. Rauh J., 2013, Kybernetika, 49, 199
  6. Smolensky P., 1986, Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, 1, 194
  7. Welling M., 2005, Advances in neural information processing systems, 17, 1481

Cited by

See all 38

Metadata

Authors
Montúfar, G. F.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Montúfar, Guido F.
Venue
Neural Computation
Published
2014-07
Volume
26
Issue
7
Pages
1386-1407
ISSN
  • 0899-7667 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-888X
OpenAlex
W2039661710
Cited by
38
References
24
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neural Computation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
Keywords
deep belief network, universal approximation, finite state space, Kullback-Leibler divergence, restricted Boltzmann machine, naive Bayes model, probability distribution approximation
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Probability, Stochastic Processes, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Universal Approximation Depth and Errors of Narrow Belief Networks with Discrete Units. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/neco_a_00601
The paper
Montúfar, G. F. (2014). Universal Approximation Depth and Errors of Narrow Belief Networks with Discrete Units. Neural Computation. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco_a_00601