Balancing new against old information: the role of puzzlement surprise in learning
Open accessAbstract
Surprise describes a range of phenomena from unexpected events to behavioral responses. We propose a novel measure of surprise and use it for surprise-driven learning. Our surprise measure takes into account data likelihood as well as the degree of commitment to a belief via the entropy of the belief distribution. We find that surprise-minimizing learning dynamically adjusts the balance between new and old information without the need of knowledge about the temporal statistics of the environment. We apply our framework to a dynamic decision-making task and a maze exploration task. Our surprise-minimizing framework is suitable for learning in complex environments, even if the environment undergoes gradual or sudden changes, and it could eventually provide a framework to study the behavior of humans and animals as they encounter surprising events.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Deviations from expected uncertainty should increase learning rates.
“Here, deviations from expected uncertainty (“unexpected uncertainty”) should increase learning rates.8,12,13,15–18”
From Serotonin neurons modulate learning rate through uncertainty (2022) · cites this paper as [18]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 115 · Cited by 68
- Authors
- Faraji, M., Preuschoff, K., & Gerstner, W.
- Affiliations
- École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
- University of Geneva (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Faraji, Mohammadjavad
- Preuschoff, Kerstin
- Gerstner, Wulfram
- Venue
- Neural Computation
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 2018-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 34-83
- ISSN
- 0899-7667 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-888X
- OpenAlex
- W2766414154
- Cited by
- 68
- References
- 115
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 4.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- infoscience.epfl.ch
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Neural Computation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Keywords
- surprise, belief updating, belief entropy, dynamic decision making, maze exploration, environmental change, temporal statistics, Bayesian learning
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Algorithms, Decision Making, Environment, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Models, Neurological, Neurons
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review