The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Geographic Determinants of Housing Supply *
Abstract
I process satellite-generated data on terrain elevation and presence of water bodies to precisely estimate the amount of developable land in U.S. metropolitan areas. The data show that residential development is effectively curtailed by the presence of steep-sloped terrain. I also find that most areas in which housing supply is regarded as inelastic are severely land-constrained by their geography. Econometrically, supply elasticities can be well characterized as functions of both physical and regulatory constraints, which in turn are endogenous to prices and demographic growth. Geography is a key factor in the contemporaneous urban development of the United States.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The connection between restrictive land-use rules and high housing prices is well established on both the metropolitan (Glaeser and Gyourko, 2017; Saiz, 2010) and sub-metropolitan scale (e.g. Kok et al., 2014)”
From The heterogeneous impacts of widespread upzoning: Lessons from Auckland, New Zealand (2024) · cites this paper as Saiz, 2010
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The heterogeneous impacts of widespread upzoning: Lessons from Auckland, New Zealand
Cheung, K. S., Monkkonen, P., & Yiu, C. Y. (2024) · Urban Studies · doi:10.1177/00420980231190281 · Cited by 18
Can zoning reform change urban development patterns? Evidence from Auckland
Greenaway-McGrevy, R., & Jones, J. A. (2025) · Urban Studies · doi:10.1177/00420980241311521 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Saiz, A.
- Venue
- Quarterly Journal of Economics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-08
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1253-1296
- ISSN
- 0033-5533
- 1531-4650
- Cited by
- 1,793
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review