The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trade Liberalization and Firm Productivity: The Case of India
Abstract
This paper exploits India's rapid, comprehensive, and externally imposed trade reform to establish a causal link between changes in tariffs and firm productivity. Pro-competitive forces, resulting from lower tariffs on final goods, as well as access to better inputs, due to lower input tariffs, both appear to have increased firm-level productivity, with input tariffs having a larger impact. The effect was strongest in import-competing industries and industries not subject to excessive domestic regulation. While we find no evidence of a differential impact according to state-level characteristics, we observe complementarities between trade liberalization and additional industrial policy reforms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2297968 · Cited by 33,272
The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity
Melitz, M. J. (2003) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/1468-0262.00467 · Cited by 12,309
The Dynamics of Productivity in the Telecommunications Equipment Industry
Olley, G. S., & Pakes, A. (1996) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/2171831 · Cited by 7,112
Estimating Production Functions Using Inputs to Control for Unobservables
Levinsohn, J., & Petrin, A. (2003) · Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1111/1467-937x.00246 · Cited by 6,496
Plants and Productivity in International Trade
Bernard, A. B., Eaton, J., Jensen, J. B., & Kortum, S. (2003) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282803769206296 · Cited by 2,980
Market Size, Trade, and Productivity
MELITZ, M. J., & OTTAVIANO, G. I. P. (2008) · Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-937x.2007.00463.x · Cited by 2,864
Trade Liberalization, Intermediate Inputs, and Productivity: Evidence from Indonesia
Amiti, M., & Konings, J. (2007) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.97.5.1611 · Cited by 2,252
Economic Integration and Endogenous Growth
Rivera-Batiz, L. A., & Romer, P. M. (1991) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2937946 · Cited by 2,022
Trade Liberalization, Exit, and Productivity Improvements: Evidence from Chilean Plants
Pavcnik, N. (2002) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1111/1467-937x.00205 · Cited by 1,777
Can Labor Regulation Hinder Economic Performance? Evidence from India
Besley, T., & Burgess, R. (2004) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355304772839533 · Cited by 1,394
Cited by
Prices, Markups, and Trade Reform
De Loecker, J., Goldberg, P. K., Khandelwal, A. K., & Pavcnik, N. (2016) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta11042 · Cited by 985
Self-citationWTO Accession and Performance of Chinese Manufacturing Firms
Brandt, L., Van Biesebroeck, J., Wang, L., & Zhang, Y. (2017) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20121266 · Cited by 856
Processing Trade, Tariff Reductions and Firm Productivity: Evidence from Chinese Firms
Yu, M. (2015) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/ecoj.12127 · Cited by 837
Distributional Effects of Globalization in Developing Countries
Goldberg, P. K., & Pavcnik, N. (2007) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.45.1.39 · Cited by 539
Import Competition and Quality Upgrading
Amiti, M., & Khandelwal, A. K. (2013) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_00271 · Cited by 530
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Topalova, P., & Khandelwal, A.
- Venue
- Review of Economics and Statistics
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 2011-08
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 995-1009
- ISSN
- 0034-6535 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-9142
- OpenAlex
- W3122774357
- Cited by
- 1,232
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 106.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trade Liberalization and Firm Productivity: The Case of India. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/rest_a_00095
- The paper
- Topalova, P., & Khandelwal, A. (2011). Trade Liberalization and Firm Productivity: The Case of India. Review of Economics and Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00095
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.