CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 180Advanced Causal Inference TechniquesSpatial and Panel Data AnalysisStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Inference in Differences-in-Differences with Few Treated Groups and Heteroskedasticity

Ferman, Bruno, Pinto, Cristine·2019·The Review of Economics and Statistics
DOI 10.1162/rest_a_00759
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We derive an inference method that works in differences-in-differences settings with few treated and many control groups in the presence of heteroskedasticity. As a leading example, we provide theoretical justification and empirical evidence that heteroskedasticity generated by variation in group sizes can invalidate existing inference methods, even in data sets with a large number of observations per group. In contrast, our inference method remains valid in this case. Our test can also be combined with feasible generalized least squares, providing a safeguard against misspecification of the serial correlation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/rest_a_00759

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 37 references

1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Behrens Walter, 1929, Landwirtschaftliche Jahrbucher, 68, 807
  2. Bell R. M., 2002, Survey Methodology, 28, 169
  3. Fisher Ronald A., 1935, The Design of Experiments

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–180 of 180

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Ferman, B., & Pinto, C.
Affiliations
Escola de Economia de São Paulo (BR)
ORCID
Venue
The Review of Economics and Statistics
Publisher
MIT Press
Published
2019-07
Volume
101
Issue
3
Pages
452-467
ISSN
  • 0034-6535 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-9142
DOI
10.1162/rest_a_00759
OpenAlex
W2113132502
Cited by
178
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 12
FWCI
11.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Review of Economics and Statistics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Keywords
difference-in-differences, heteroscedasticity, inference, serial correlation, feasible generalized least squares, model misspecification, causal inference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review