Compressing Large-Scale Transformer-Based Models: A Case Study on BERT
Open accessAbstract
Pre-trained Transformer-based models have achieved state-of-the-art performance for various Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. However, these models often have billions of parameters, and thus are too resource- hungry and computation-intensive to suit low- capability devices or applications with strict latency requirements. One potential remedy for this is model compression, which has attracted considerable research attention. Here, we summarize the research in compressing Transformers, focusing on the especially popular BERT model. In particular, we survey the state of the art in compression for BERT, we clarify the current best practices for compressing large-scale Transformer models, and we provide insights into the workings of various methods. Our categorization and analysis also shed light on promising future research directions for achieving lightweight, accurate, and generic NLP models.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
FFNs become a bottleneck on CPUs.
“Ganesh et al. [102] showed that MHA and FFN layers take almost similar time on GPUs even though the former layer account for 1/3rd of the parameters, while FFNs become a bottleneck on CPUs.”
From A Survey of Techniques for Optimizing Transformer Inference (2023) · cites this paper as [102]
Ganesh et al. showed that MHA and FFN layers take almost similar time on GPUs even though MHA accounts for 1/3rd of the parameters.
“Ganesh et al. [102] showed that MHA and FFN layers take almost similar time on GPUs even though the former layer account for 1/3rd of the parameters, while FFNs become a bottleneck on CPUs.”
From A Survey of Techniques for Optimizing Transformer Inference (2023) · cites this paper as [102]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 77 · Cited by 190
- Authors
- Ganesh, P., Chen, Y., Lou, X., Khan, M. A., Yang, Y., Sajjad, H., Nakov, P., Chen, D., & Winslett, M.
- Affiliations
- Advanced Digital Sciences Center (SG)
- Hamad bin Khalifa University (QA)
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Venue
- Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 2021
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- 1061-1080
- ISSN
- 2307-387X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3007007518
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 77
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 20
- FWCI
- 10.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Qatar Foundation (NPRP10-0208-170408)
- National Research Foundation
- Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg
- Qatar National Research Fund (NPRP10, NPRP10-0208-170408)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- model compression, BERT, transformer models, large-scale neural networks, resource-constrained devices, latency reduction, pre-trained language models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review