Cited by 190Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsTopic ModelingDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Compressing Large-Scale Transformer-Based Models: A Case Study on BERT

Open access
Ganesh, Prakhar, Chen, Yao, Lou, Xin, Khan, Mohammad Ali, Yang, Yin, Sajjad, Hassan, Nakov, Preslav, Chen, Deming +1 more·2021·Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Abstract

Pre-trained Transformer-based models have achieved state-of-the-art performance for various Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. However, these models often have billions of parameters, and thus are too resource- hungry and computation-intensive to suit low- capability devices or applications with strict latency requirements. One potential remedy for this is model compression, which has attracted considerable research attention. Here, we summarize the research in compressing Transformers, focusing on the especially popular BERT model. In particular, we survey the state of the art in compression for BERT, we clarify the current best practices for compressing large-scale Transformer models, and we provide insights into the workings of various methods. Our categorization and analysis also shed light on promising future research directions for achieving lightweight, accurate, and generic NLP models.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/tacl_a_00413

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • FFNs become a bottleneck on CPUs.

    “Ganesh et al. [102] showed that MHA and FFN layers take almost similar time on GPUs even though the former layer account for 1/3rd of the parameters, while FFNs become a bottleneck on CPUs.”

    From A Survey of Techniques for Optimizing Transformer Inference (2023) · cites this paper as [102]

  • Ganesh et al. showed that MHA and FFN layers take almost similar time on GPUs even though MHA accounts for 1/3rd of the parameters.

    “Ganesh et al. [102] showed that MHA and FFN layers take almost similar time on GPUs even though the former layer account for 1/3rd of the parameters, while FFNs become a bottleneck on CPUs.”

    From A Survey of Techniques for Optimizing Transformer Inference (2023) · cites this paper as [102]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 77 · Cited by 190

Authors
Ganesh, P., Chen, Y., Lou, X., Khan, M. A., Yang, Y., Sajjad, H., Nakov, P., Chen, D., & Winslett, M.
Affiliations
  • Advanced Digital Sciences Center (SG)
  • Hamad bin Khalifa University (QA)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Venue
Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
Published
2021
Volume
9
Pages
1061-1080
ISSN
2307-387X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3007007518
Cited by
190
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 20
FWCI
10.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Qatar Foundation (NPRP10-0208-170408)
  • National Research Foundation
  • Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg
  • Qatar National Research Fund (NPRP10, NPRP10-0208-170408)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
model compression, BERT, transformer models, large-scale neural networks, resource-constrained devices, latency reduction, pre-trained language models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review