The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Xinjiang’s Production and Construction Corps, and the Sinification of Eastern Turkestan
Abstract
A major institution for the ethnic Han (Chinese) colonisation of Xinjiang is the Production and Construction Corps. Although quasi-military in origin, its military role is now eclipsed by its economic role. Traditionally it was primarily a collection of state farms, but in recent years its industrial enterprises have expanded. It has also played a role in imprisoning convicts from eastern China. Largely destroyed during the Cultural Revolution, it was actually abolished for a few years beginning in 1975. But the perceived need to project Chinese influence into the area, and to protect against ethnic unrest and Soviet pressures, persuaded the authorities that the Corps should be revived. Today the Corps has 2.8 million members, or 14 percent of Xinjiang’s population, and plays a significant role in the region’s economy.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, the XPCC's military function as a signifijicant national defence force is a topic hitherto unexplored by Western scholars.”
From The Chinese Legionaries at the Western Frontier: The Military Role of the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, 1960-1975 (2012) · cites this paper as Seymour 2000
Citations
Cited by
Cai, Y. (2012) · Journal of Chinese Military History · doi:10.1163/221274512x651651
Metadata
- Authors
- Seymour, J. D.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Seymour, James D.
- Venue
- Inner Asia
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2000
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 171-193
- ISSN
- 1464-8172 (ISSN-L)
- 2210-5018
- OpenAlex
- W2026054089
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 2.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Inner Asia (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Soviet and Russian History
- Keywords
- Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, sinification, state farms, industrial enterprises, convicts, Cultural Revolution, ethnic unrest, Xinjiang economy, ethnic minorities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
