Cited by 47Biblical Studies and InterpretationAncient Near East HistoryLanguage, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Akkadian Commentaries from Ancient Mesopotamia and Their Relation to Early Hebrew Exegesis

Gabbay, Uri·2012·Dead Sea Discoveries

Abstract

Commentaries from ancient Mesopotamia, written in cuneiform script and in the Akkadian language, are known from the eighth century B.C.E. up to the last centuries B.C.E. The article investigates the authority of the texts about which commentaries are known, often considered canonical and divine, vis-a-vis the authority of the commentaries themselves, considered oral tradition transmitted by scholars. This is comparable to the authority of the biblical texts that serve as the base for early Jewish interpretations, and to the authority of the commentaries containing these interpretations, both in Qumran and in early Rabbinic literature. The article also surveys and analyzes various hermeneutical terms and techniques found in ancient Mesopotamian commentaries in relation to early Jewish commentaries. In addition, the article discusses the pesharim from Qumran in their divinatory context, in light of omen interpretations from Mesopotamia which use the noun pisru.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/15685179-12341235

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gabbay, U.
Affiliations
Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Corresponding author
Gabbay, Uri
Venue
Dead Sea Discoveries
Published
2012
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
267-312
ISSN
  • 0929-0761 (ISSN-L)
  • 1568-5179
OpenAlex
W2017843047
Cited by
47
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
11.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Dead Sea Discoveries (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Ancient Near East History
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
Keywords
rabbinic literature, hermeneutics, cuneiform tablets, oral tradition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review