Cited by 59Study and Philosophy of ReligionPhilosophy, History, and HistoriographyCultural and Mythological Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A TWICE-TOLD TALE: THE HISTORY OF THE HISTORY OF RELIGIONS' HISTORY

Smith, Jonathan·2001·Numen

Abstract

Selon l'A., il ne convient pas de concevoir l'histoire de l'histoire des religions comme une liberation de l'hegemonie de la theologie. Il propose sa variante de «cette histoire racontee deux fois» concernant les mythes et le rituel des religions : il pense que cette facon de re-raconter l'histoire stoppe une question plus fondamentale, le debat entre une interpretation de la religion fondee sur la «presence», et une autre fondee sur la «representation».

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/156852701750152636

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Smith, J.
Corresponding author
Smith, Jonathan
Venue
Numen
Published
2001
Volume
48
Issue
2
Pages
131-146
ISSN
  • 0029-5973 (ISSN-L)
  • 1568-5276
OpenAlex
W1969699308
Cited by
59
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
45.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Numen (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Philosophy, History, and Historiography
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › General Arts and Humanities › Cultural and Mythological Studies
Keywords
historiography of religion, myth, ritual, religious interpretation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review