Cited by 35Classical Philosophy and ThoughtClassical Antiquity StudiesEpistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lucretius, Symmetry arguments, and fearing death

Warren, James·2001·Phronesis

Abstract

This paper identifies two possible versions of the Epicurean 'Symmetry argument', both of which claim that post mortem non-existence is relevantly like prenatal non-existence and that therefore our attitude to the former should be the same as that towards the latter. One version addresses the fear of the state of being dead by making it equivalent to the state of not yet being born; the other addresses the prospective fear of dying by relating it to our present retrospective attitude to the time before birth. I argue that only the first of these is present in the relevant sections of Lucretius (DRN 3.832-42, 972-5). Therefore, this argument is not aimed at a prospective fear of death, or a fear of 'mortality'. That particular fear is instead addressed by the Epicureans through the additional premise (found in the Letter to Menoeceus 125) that it is irrational to fear in prospect an event which is known to be painless when present. This still leaves unaddressed the related fear of 'premature death', which is to be removed through the acceptance of Epicurean hedonism.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/156852801753736508

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 35

Metadata

Authors
Warren, J.
Corresponding author
Warren, James
Venue
Phronesis
Published
2001
Volume
46
Issue
4
Pages
466-491
ISSN
  • 0031-8868 (ISSN-L)
  • 1568-5284
OpenAlex
W2020586713
Cited by
35
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Phronesis (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Classical Philosophy and Thought
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Classics › Classical Antiquity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
Keywords
Lucretius, symmetry arguments, Epicureanism, fear of death, mortality, premature mortality, De rerum natura, Epicurean ethics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review