Cited by 53

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Relationship between Empathy and Personality in Undergraduate Students’ Attitudes toward Nonhuman Animals

Eckardt Erlanger, Ann C., Tsytsarev, Sergei V.·2012·Society & Animals

Abstract

The majority of research investigating beliefs toward nonhuman animals has focused on vivisection or utilized populations with clear views on animal issues (e.g., animal rights activists). Minimal research has been conducted on what personality factors influence a nonclinical or nonadjudicated population’s beliefs about the treatment of animals. The purpose of the present study was to examine the role of empathy and personality traits in attitudes about the treatment of animals in 241 undergraduate students. Results indicated that those with high levels of empathy held more positive attitudes toward animals and more negative beliefs about animal cruelty than those with low levels of empathy. Some differences in participants’ specific attitudes toward animals were found. Limitations and implications for future research are reviewed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/156853012x614341

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Agnew, 1998, The causes of animal abuse: A social-psychological analysis, Theoretical Criminology, 2, 177, 10.1177/1362480698002002003 · DOI
  2. Allport, 1954, The nature of prejudice
  3. Alterman, 2003, Latent structure of the Davis Interpersonal Reactivity Index in methadone maintenance patients, Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 25, 257, 10.1023/A:1025936213110 · DOI
  4. 2009, Teen kills kitten in oven; faces 10-year sentence, News Alert: June 12, 2009
  5. 2000, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
  6. Baldry, 2005, animal abuse among preadolescents directly and indirectly victimized at school and at home, Criminal Behavior and Mental Health, 15, 97
  7. Bem, 1981, Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing, Psychological Review, 88, 354
  8. Boat, 1999, Abuse of children and abuse of animals: Using the links to inform child assessment and protection, 83
  9. Broida, 1993, Personality differences between pro and antivivisectionists, Society & animals, 1, 129
  10. Cattell, 1970, Handbook for the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire
  11. Cohen, 1992, A power primer, Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155
  12. Costa, 1992, Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEOFFI): Professional manual
  13. Crowne, 1960, A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology, Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349
  14. Davis, 1980, A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy, JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85
  15. Davis, 1983, Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113
  16. Devito, 1985, Review of Myers-Briggs type indicator, 1030
  17. Engler, 2003, Personality theories
  18. Goldberg, 1999, A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models, Vol. 7, 7
  19. Gupta, 2008, Functional links between intimate partner violence and animal abuse: Personality features and representations of aggression, Society & animals, 16, 223, 10.1163/156853008X323385 · DOI
  20. Gupta, 2003, animal abuse and callousness: Predicting frequency and severity of partner-directed physical violence in men
  21. Gupta, 2001, Aggression toward animals Scale
  22. Henry, 2004, The relationship between animal cruelty, delinquency, and attitudes toward the treatment of animals, Society & animals, 12, 185
  23. Henry, 2006, Empathy, home environment, and attitudes toward animals in relation to animal abuse, Anthrozoös, 19, 17
  24. Hensley, 2005, animal cruelty motivations assessing demographic and situational influences, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 1429
  25. Hensley, 2008, The effects of inmates’ self-reported childhood and adolescent animal cruelty: Motivations on the number of convictions for adults violent interpersonal crimes, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 52, 175
  26. Herzog, 1991, Sex role identity and attitudes toward animals, Anthrozoös, 4, 184
  27. Hills, 1993, The motivational bases of attitudes toward animals, Society & animals, 1, 111
  28. Jory, 1999, The AniCare model of treatment for animal abuse
  29. Matthews, 1997, Personality and attitudes toward the treatment of animals, Society & animals, 5, 169
  30. McCrae, 1987, Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1258
  31. Pagani, 2007, Italian youths’ attitudes toward, and concern for, animals, Anthrozoös, 20, 275
  32. Randour, 2002, AniCare child: An assessment and treatment approach for childhood animal abuse
  33. Signal, 2007, Attitudes to animals: Demographics within a community sample, Society & animals, 14, 147
  34. Takooshian, 1988, Opinions on animal research: Scientists versus the public, PsyETA Bulletin, 7, 5
  35. Taylor, 2005, Empathy and attitudes toward animals, Anthrozoös, 18, 18
  36. Twarowski, 2007, Sick puppies: Killers at large in Brentwood, Long Island Press, 8
  37. Wright, 2003, From animal cruelty to serial murder: Applying the graduation hypothesis, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 47, 71

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Eckardt Erlanger, A. C., & Tsytsarev, S. V.
Affiliations
* Hofstra University and New York University1 ann.erlanger@nyu.edu ** Hofstra University
Venue
Society & Animals
Published
2012
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
21-38
ISSN
  • 1063-1119
  • 1568-5306
Cited by
53
References
2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review