The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A New Religious Movement in Singapore: Syncretism and Variation in the Sathya Sai Baba Movement
Abstract
This ethnographic study of the Sathya Sai Baba Movement in Singapore situates itself within the sociological study of New Religious Movements (NRMs). Studies on the expansion of “cults” and NRMs are well documented, but little has been done to explore how such movements proceed after the initial foothold has been established in the host country. Patterns of interaction with the highly plural socio-ethnic and religious elements that exist in multicultural nations, as in Singapore, and the attendant social implications have not been sufficiently addressed. The Sai Baba movement preaches and practises ethno-religious ecumenism and allow adherents to maintain the religious affiliations and practices of their parent or current religion. This paper explores the nature of the Sathya Sai Baba Movement's religious framework and its apparent success in pluralistic Singapore by studying the impact of syncretism and ritual variations on the identity of the movement.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The way local communities interpret and change modern transnationalised yoga movements is only beginning to be considered in modern yoga studies, but has had some attention in studies of Sathya Sai Baba and Sivananda Yoga Centres.
“The way in which local communities interpret and change modern, transnationalised yoga movements is an area which is only beginning to be considered in modern yoga studies, but has had some attention by those looking at Sathya Sai Baba as a global movement (Kent 2005, Pereira 2008, Sangha and Sahoo 2006) and Sivananda Yoga Centres (Strauss 2005 and Altglas 2005, 2007a and 200”
From The development of modern yoga: A survey of the field (2009) · cites this paper as Pereira 2008
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The development of modern yoga: A survey of the field
Newcombe, S. (2009) · Religion Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1749-8171.2009.00171.x · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Pereira, S.
- Affiliations
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- Corresponding author
- Pereira, Shane
- ORCID
- Pereira, Shane
- Venue
- Asian Journal of Social Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 250-270
- ISSN
- 0303-8246 (ISSN-L)
- 1568-4849
- 1568-5314
- OpenAlex
- W2041482681
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 3.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Asian journal of social science (publishedVersion)
- National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society in Latin America
- Keywords
- new religious movements, syncretism, religious pluralism, multiculturalism, religious identity, Singapore
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review