CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 6Intergenerational Family Dynamics and CaregivingAging, Elder Care, and Social IssuesSocial Policy and Reform Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Culture or Context?: Comparing Recent Trajectories of Elder Care Development in China and Taiwan

Open access
Payette, Alex, Chien, Yi-Chun·2020·Asian Journal of Social Science
DOI 10.1163/15685314-04803003
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Policy legacies are an important factor explaining how, regardless of the nontraditional discourse, previously implemented laws and policies have greatly influenced the state of eldercare arrangements in both China and Taiwan. On the one hand, Taiwan has been shifting eldercare responsibilities from the family to the public through a series of social policy reforms fueled by political demands from the civil society since its democratic transition, whereas the Chinese Party-State enacted a series of filial laws in addition to reform policies, which inflated the demand and supply for familial care while at the same time impacting the development of institutional eldercare. While the issue often framed as the prevalence of filial culture in Chinese societies, this article argues, through a path dependency-based perspective, that legal provisions, policies and the structure of the political competition are largely responsible for shaping current eldercare arrangements on both sides of the strait.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/15685314-04803003

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 48 references

2 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 6

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Payette, A., & Chien, Y.-C.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • National Chengchi University (TW)
ORCID
Venue
Asian Journal of Social Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-09-24
Volume
48
Issue
3-4
Pages
227-249
ISSN
  • 0303-8246 (ISSN-L)
  • 1568-4849
  • 1568-5314
DOI
10.1163/15685314-04803003
OpenAlex
W3092156643
Cited by
6
References
48
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
Asian journal of social science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Policy and Reform Studies
Keywords
elderly care, policy legacies, path dependence, family-based care, social policy reform, civil society, democratic transition, political competition, China, Taiwan, cross-strait comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review