The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Autour D'Une Traduction Sanscrite Du Tao Tö King
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Thus, when Emperor Taizong (r. 627-650) ordered the monk Xuanzang 玄奘 (600-664) to translate the Daode jing into Sanskrit in collaboration with a group of Daoists, Cai Huang 蔡晃 (7 th c.) claimed to have studied the scriptures of the Buddhist Three Treatise School and the Vimalakīrti sutra so well that phrases from them issued 'spontaneously' in his discourse (T 2104, 3.386c; Pelliot 1912, 391).”
From Stealing Words: Intellectual Property in Medieval China (2016) · cites this paper as Pelliot 1912, 391
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sen, T. (2001) · Journal of World History · doi:10.1353/jwh.2001.0025 · Cited by 16
Stealing Words: Intellectual Property in Medieval China
Assandri, F. (2016) · Journal of Daoist Studies · doi:10.1353/dao.2016.0002 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Pelliot, P.
- Corresponding author
- Pelliot, Paul
- Venue
- T'oung Pao
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 1912
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 351-430
- ISSN
- 0082-5433 (ISSN-L)
- 1568-5322
- OpenAlex
- W2028668054
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- fr
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- T oung Pao (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Translation Studies and Practices
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Keywords
- Laozi, Sanskrit translation, Chinese philosophy, translation of Chinese classics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
