The Structural Paradigm of the Ten Plagues Narrative and the Hardening of Pharaoh’s Heart
Abstract
The Ten Plagues narrative is classically considered a heavily redacted unit. The most widely accepted structural division in research is the model of three units of three plagues, which concludes with the death of the firstborn (3-3-3-1). This theory, well justified as it is from a structural and textual perspective, is not without its problems. One notable issue is its failure to explain the anomalous description of the seventh and eighth plagues, hail and locusts. This study proposes a new division of the plagues into a unit of seven plagues followed by a unit of three. This division, which, I will show, is supported by the redactive design, has special theological significance. Through this model, I will illustrate how (at least) two different structural paradigms can coexist within a single narrative, illuminating different facets of the multilayered text. In this paradigm, the plagues narrative emerges as two educational processes: the first seven plagues, ending with the plague of hail, are designed to educate Pharaoh and the Egyptians, while the unit of three is also geared towards the education of the Israelites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PP8-10, unlike PP1-7, feature darkness-a characteristic that is the opposite of the sun god.
“A careful reading of M2 demonstrates that PP8-10, unlike PP1-7, feature darkness-a characteristic that is the opposite of the sun god (Grossman 2014, pp.607-8).”
From The Journey through the Netherworld and the Death of the Sun God: A Novel Reading of Exodus 7–15 in Light of the Book of Gates (2023) · cites this paper as Grossman 2014
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lee, S. (2023) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel14030343 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Grossman, J.
- Affiliations
- Bar-Ilan University (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Grossman, Jonathan
- ORCID
- Grossman, Jonathan
- Venue
- Vetus Testamentum
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2014-09-22
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 588-610
- ISSN
- 0042-4935 (ISSN-L)
- 1568-5330
- OpenAlex
- W2090740203
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 6.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Vetus Testamentum (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
- Keywords
- Exodus narrative, structural analysis, editorial history, narrative units
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review