The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Priestly Source Recovered Intact?
Abstract
A propos du Pentateuque, l'A. se propose de faire l'etat des recherches concernant la theorie documentaire et plus particulierement la source sacerdotale. Il s'agit pour lui de reunir les presomptions qui peuvent amener a penser legitimement l'existence de cette source documentaire. C'est pour lui l'occasion de demontrer que le document sacerdotal n'est pas a considerer comme un ensemble de scholies redactionnelles mais comme un texte a part entiere
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, Uwe Gleßmer has shown that this calendar was almost as precise as ours with its 365.25 days per average year.”
From Tracing the Origin of the Sabbatical Calendar in the Priestly Narrative (Genesis 1 to Joshua 5) (2005) · cites this paper as [9]
In the citing paper
“This is 51 minutes short of the exact solar year (365.2422days) 9 .”
From Tracing the Origin of the Sabbatical Calendar in the Priestly Narrative (Genesis 1 to Joshua 5) (2005) · cites this paper as [9]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tracing the Origin of the Sabbatical Calendar in the Priestly Narrative (Genesis 1 to Joshua 5)
Guillaume, P. (2005) · The Journal of Hebrew Scriptures · doi:10.5508/jhs.2005.v5.a13 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Propp, W.
- Affiliations
- 1San Diego
- Corresponding author
- Propp, William
- Venue
- Vetus Testamentum
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 1996
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 458-478
- ISSN
- 0042-4935 (ISSN-L)
- 1568-5330
- OpenAlex
- W1983377555
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 17 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Vetus Testamentum (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
- Keywords
- Priestly source, documentary hypothesis, Pentateuch, Pentateuchal composition, editorial history, Hebrew Bible, source criticism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Priestly Source Recovered Intact? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1163/1568533962581783
- The paper
- Propp, W. (1996). The Priestly Source Recovered Intact? Vetus Testamentum. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568533962581783
