CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 5Biblical Studies and InterpretationClassical Studies and PhilologyClassical Antiquity Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Written Torah and the Oral Gospel: Romans 10:5-13 in the Dynamic Tension between Orality and Literacy

Ito, Akio·2006·Novum Testamentum
DOI 10.1163/156853606777836381
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article attempts to locate Rom. 10:5-13 within the tension of orality and literacy. There has been a debate concerning the precise nature of the relationship between Lev. 18:5 cited in 10:5 and Deut. 30 cited in 10:6-8. Here it is argued that Paul emphasizes the antithesis between the orality of the Gospel and the literacy of the Torah because he understands himself as living and working in the tradition of the “herald” of Isaiah 52. Against the orality of the Gospel he stresses the literacy of the Torah when he introduces the Leviticus citation with “Moses writes” in 10:5.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/156853606777836381

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 5

Metadata

Authors
Ito, A.
Affiliations
1Inzai-Shi
Corresponding author
Ito, Akio
Venue
Novum Testamentum
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Published
2006
Volume
48
Issue
3
Pages
234-260
ISSN
  • 0048-1009 (ISSN-L)
  • 1568-5365
DOI
10.1163/156853606777836381
OpenAlex
W2033675857
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Novum Testamentum (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Classical Studies and Philology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Classics › Classical Antiquity Studies
Keywords
orality and literacy, Pentateuch, Gospels, Pauline theology, Deuteronomy 30, heralds, biblical citations, New Testament exegesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Written Torah and the Oral Gospel: Romans 10:5-13 in the Dynamic Tension between Orality and Literacy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1163/156853606777836381
The paper
Ito, A. (2006). The Written Torah and the Oral Gospel: Romans 10:5-13 in the Dynamic Tension between Orality and Literacy. Novum Testamentum. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853606777836381