The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SEXUAL SEGREGATION IN UNGULATES: A NEW APPROACH
Abstract
In many mammals,males and females live solitarilyor in separate groups outside the breeding season. Sexual segregation is wide-spread in ungulates, but also occurs in whales, seals, monkeys, macropods, elephants, sh and bird species. What causes segregation by sex is still poorly understood, despite intense research done mainly on different ungulate species. In most species studied, males were clearly larger than females. The evolution of sexual dimorphism in body size has largely been attributed to sexual selection and mating strategies. While the consequences of body-size differences on energy requirements and metabolic rates received most attention, studies on consequences of sexual body-size differences on behavior are lacking. This review emphasizes the importance to study a wide range of social mammals with a different or no degree of sexual segregation and sexual dimorphism in body size; something which has not been done and has greatly limited our ability to test alternative hypotheses. More emphasis has to be put on the study of activity budgets, sociality and habitat choice of non-dimorphic species to explain the evolution of permanent territoriality, of long-term bonds of male-female pairs and of the occurrence of mixed-sex groups (adults), as well as its absence in dimorphic species. We review ve hypotheses proposed to explain sexual segregation, discuss alternative outcomes and predictions for each hypothesis, suggest alternative explanations for the evolution of sexual segregation and mating systems, and indicate new and important directions for research. We conclude that a phylogenetic comparison of behavior of a wide range of ungulates and other mammals will be needed to solve the enigma of sexual segregation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The descent of man and selection in relation to sex
(1907) · The Journal of the Anthropological Society of Tokyo · doi:10.1537/ase1887.22.495 · Cited by 10,892
Nutritional ecology of the ruminant
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-4505 · Cited by 7,757
Nowak, R. (1999) · doi:10.56021/9780801857898 · Cited by 4,102
Red Deer. Behavior and Ecology of Two Sexes
Watson, A., Clutton-Brock, T. H., Guinness, F. E., & Albon, S. D. (1983) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/4471 · Cited by 2,460
Kleiber, M. (1932) · Hilgardia · doi:10.3733/hilg.v06n11p315 · Cited by 2,222
Wildlife Feeding and Nutrition
(1983) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-11381-5 · Cited by 1,630
The Allometry of Food Intake in Grazing Ruminants
Illius, A. W., & Gordon, I. J. (1987) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/4961 · Cited by 550
Fennessy, P. F. (1984) · Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · doi:10.1080/03036758.1984.10426307 · Cited by 528
On the Relationship of Social Evolution and Ecology in Ungulates
GEIST, V. (1974) · American Zoologist · doi:10.1093/icb/14.1.205 · Cited by 501
Bioenergetics of Wild Herbivores
Hudson, R. J. (2018) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781351070218 · Cited by 444
Cited by
Consensus decision making in animals
Conradt, L., & Roper, T. J. (2005) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.008 · Cited by 872
Keerthipriya, P., Nandini, S., & Vidya, T. N. C. (2021) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2021.616666 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Ruckstuhl, K., & Neuhaus, P.
- Venue
- Behaviour
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2000
- Volume
- 137
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 361-377
- ISSN
- 0005-7959 (ISSN-L)
- 1568-539X
- OpenAlex
- W2116158608
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 8.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SEXUAL SEGREGATION IN UNGULATES: A NEW APPROACH. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1163/156853900502123
- The paper
- Ruckstuhl, K., & Neuhaus, P. (2000). SEXUAL SEGREGATION IN UNGULATES: A NEW APPROACH. Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853900502123
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.