The comfort movements of Anatidae
Abstract
The comfort movements of Anatidae are described in detail on the basis of observations on 114 species including representatives of all tribes except the Torrent Ducks (Merganetta). A fundamental distinction is made between the occurrence of comfort movements in (1) basic situations (where they are apparently serving their original functions, mostly in caring for the body surface) and (2) secondary situations (where the movements appear irrelevant and unlikely to be serving their original functions). Under ''basic situations'', the form of each movement in the Mallard is described, and attention is drawn to variations occurring in other species. Note is made of the situations in which the comfort movement is performed, and its probable function is discussed. Under ''secondary situations'', an attempt is made to distinguish between instances in which the movement is serving as a social signal and those in which it is not. Comfort movements are classified into seven broad categories : shaking movements, stretching movements, cleaning movements, oiling preening, nibbling preening, washing, and bathing. Most of the nine shaking movements probably function to remove water or foreign material from various parts of the body. The frequency of wing-flapping in White-fronted Geese increases in response to rain and dense fog. Vigorous wing-shaking occurs during oiling and it may have a special function in relation to this activity. Wing-shuffling and tail-fanning are performed after bath…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Comfort behaviours such as preening are generally more likely to occur when the animal is not threatened.
“Presumably, comfort behaviours such as preening are generally more likely to occur when the animal is not threatened [19,48,49,50].”
From Effects of Regulating Visitor Viewing Proximity and the Intensity of Visitor Behaviour on Little Penguin (Eudyptula minor) Behaviour and Welfare (2019) · cites this paper as [48]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Feather damaging behaviour in parrots: A review with consideration of comparative aspects
van Zeeland, Y. R. A., Spruit, B. M., Rodenburg, T. B., Riedstra, B., van Hierden, Y. M., Buitenhuis, B., Korte, S. M., & Lumeij, J. T. (2009) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2009.09.006 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Chiew, S. J., Butler, K. L., Sherwen, S. L., Coleman, G. J., Fanson, K. V., & Hemsworth, P. H. (2019) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani9060285 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
- Authors
- McKinney, F.
- Affiliations
- University of Bristol (GB)
- Corresponding author
- McKinney, F.
- Venue
- Behaviour
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 1965
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 120-220
- ISSN
- 0005-7959 (ISSN-L)
- 1568-539X
- OpenAlex
- W2005387365
- Cited by
- 132
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behaviour (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
- Keywords
- Anatidae, waterfowl, preening, oiling, bathing, flapping wings, scratching behavior, social signals, Anas platyrhynchos, white-fronted goose, green-winged teal, incubation behavior, parental care, brood parasitism
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Behavior, Animal, Movement, Poultry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review