The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Food Searching Behaviour of Two European Thrushes
Abstract
1. The movement path of a predator will clearly be an important determinant of its ability to encounter and subsequently attack suitable prey items. Previous work on this aspect of searching behaviour has been mainly carried out on invertebrates, while this study describes the movement paths of two bird predators, the european blackbird and the song thrush (collectively referred to as 'thrushes') on a grass meadow in central Oxford. 2. The paths of foraging thrushes are divided up into natural units consisting of a series of alternating moves and pauses. A method of mapping these moves is presented (Figs 2, 3). 3. The large scale movements of the thrushes on the meadow was not uniform and this was probably related to non-uniformity in the environment, possibly including factors influencing feeding success (Figs 4, 6). 4. The durations of the moves and pauses were measured from cine film and video tape records. Only between one sixth and one tenth of the total foraging time was spent in actual movement, the remainder probably being spent largely in scanning for, or attacking, potential prey objects (Figs 7, 8). 5. Measures of the individual move lengths and angles. turned between successive moves were taken from the maps (Figs 3, 9), and the average speeds of movement were calculated for each track. Song thrushes and female blackbirds made longer moves than male blackbirds, and female blackbirds moved across the meadow at a higher overall speed than male blackbirds or song thrushes (Tables 1-4). 6. Methods are presented for describing the 'rules of movement' of the thrushes across the study meadow. When feeding mainly on earthworms, thrushes tended to make sequences of three, or possibly more, moves that were similar in length, and to make pairs, triplets, and possibly bigger groupings of alternating left and right turns. The size of each move was independent of the sign of the preceding turn and vice versa. The tendency of successive turns to alternate in sign, combined with the relatively restricted size of turns between moves, produced an ongoing search path, thus avoiding the pitfall of searching the same ground twice in a short time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem
Charnov, E. L. (1976) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(76)90040-x · Cited by 5,374
Analyzing insect movement as a correlated random walk
Kareiva, P. M., & Shigesada, N. (1983) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00379695 · Cited by 681
How to reliably estimate the tortuosity of an animal's path:
Benhamou, S. (2004) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.03.016 · Cited by 579
Optimal foraging: Movement patterns of bumblebees between inflorescences
Pyke, G. H. (1978) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(78)90036-9 · Cited by 465
Spatial analysis of animals' movements using a correlated random walk model
Bovet, P., & Benhamou, S. (1988) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5193(88)80038-9 · Cited by 441
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, J. N. M.
- Venue
- Behaviour
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 1974
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1-4
- Pages
- 276-301
- ISSN
- 0005-7959 (ISSN-L)
- 1568-539X
- OpenAlex
- W2042298188
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Food Searching Behaviour of Two European Thrushes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1163/156853974x00363
- The paper
- Smith, J. N. M. (1974). The Food Searching Behaviour of Two European Thrushes. Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853974x00363
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.