The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Concept and Definition of Dominance in Animal Behaviour
Abstract
The concept of dominance has contributed greatly to our understanding of social structure in animals. Over the past three decades, however, a variety of concepts and definitions of dominance have been introduced, leading to an ongoing debate about the usefulness and meaning of the concept. Criticisms aimed at one definition of dominance do not necessarilly apply to other definitions. Existing definitions can be structural or functional, refer to roles or to agonistic behaviour, regard dominance as a property of individuals or as an attribute of dyadic encounters, concentrate on aggression or on the lack of it, and be based either on theoretical constructs or on observable behaviour. Thirteen definitions of dominance are reviewed, and their usefulness assessed with respect to their descriptive value. The predictive and explanatory values of definitions are specific to the questions asked in each particular study and are not considered as criteria to judge the usefulness of the dominance concept. By virtue of its high descriptive value, the original definition of dominance by SCHJELDERUPP-EBBE (1922, Z.Psychol. 88: 226-252) emerged as the basis to formulate a structural definition with wide applicability and which reflects the essence of the concept: Dominance is an attribute of the pattern of repeated, agonistic interactions between two individuals, characterized by a consistent outcome in favour of the same dyad member and a default yielding response of its opponent rather than escalation. The status of the consistent winner is dominant and that of the loser subordinate. Dominance status refers to dyads while dominance rank, high or low, refers to the position in a hierarchy and, thus, depends on group composition. Dominance is a relative measure and not an absolute property of individuals. The discussion includes reference to the heritability of dominance, application of dominance to groups rather than individuals, and the role of individual recognition and memory during agonistic encounters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An improved test of linearity in dominance hierarchies containing unknown or tied relationships
de Vries, H. (1995) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/0003-3472(95)80053-0 · Cited by 587
Bidirectional control of social hierarchy by synaptic efficacy in medial prefrontal cortex
Wang, F., Zhu, J., Zhu, H., Zhang, Q., Lin, Z., & Hu, H. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1209951 · Cited by 528
Dorsal raphe dopamine neurons represent the experience of social isolation
Matthews, G. A., Nieh, E. H., Vander Weele, C. M., Halbert, S. A., Pradhan, R. V., Yosafat, A. S., Glober, G. F., Izadmehr, E. M., Thomas, R. E., Lacy, G. D., et al. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.12.040 · Cited by 402
Correlated neural activity and encoding of behavior across brains of socially interacting animals
Kingsbury, L., Huang, S., Wang, J., Gu, K., Golshani, P., Wu, Y. E., & Hong, W. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.022 · Cited by 380
Individual differences versus social dynamics in the formation of animal dominance hierarchies
Chase, I. D., Tovey, C., Spangler-Martin, D., & Manfredonia, M. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.082104199 · Cited by 370
Metadata
- Authors
- Drews, C.
- Venue
- Behaviour
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 1993
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 283-313
- ISSN
- 0005-7959 (ISSN-L)
- 1568-539X
- OpenAlex
- W2077208509
- Cited by
- 796
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Concept and Definition of Dominance in Animal Behaviour. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1163/156853993x00290
- The paper
- Drews, C. (1993). The Concept and Definition of Dominance in Animal Behaviour. Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853993x00290
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.