Cited by 17Amphibian and Reptile BiologyAnimal Behavior and ReproductionOlfactory and Sensory Function Studies

Chemically mediated self-recognition in sibling juvenile common gartersnakes (Thamnophis sirtalis) reared on same or different diets: Evidence for a chemical mirror?

Burghardt, Gordon M., Partin, Adam M., Pepper, Harry E., Steele, Jordan M., Liske, Samuel M., Stokes, Allyson E., Lathan, Ariel N., Springer, Cary M. +1 more·2021·Behaviour

Abstract

Abstract Although self-recognition or self-awareness has been studied with the visually-based mirror test, passed by several species, primarily apes, the possibility of a chemically-based analogue is controversial. Prior studies suggested that chemical self-recognition may occur in some squamate reptiles. To evaluate this possibility, we studied 24 individually housed gartersnakes, Thamnophis sirtalis , raised from birth on either earthworm or fish diets and tested 12 male and 12 female snakes with cage liners that were either clean, their own, or from same-sex siblings fed their own or the opposite diet. Tongue flicking and activity were recorded in 30-minute video-recorded trials in a balanced design. After initial habituation to the stimuli, male, but not female, snakes discriminated between their own stimuli and those from littermates fed the same diet. Combined with other data and studies, the possibility that a chemical ‘mirror’ form of self-recognition exists in squamate reptiles is supported.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/1568539x-bja10131

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reptiles are not asocial; they exhibit diverse and often complex social behaviors.

    “Moreover, reptiles are not asocial, although even reptile researchers who should know better continue to make such claims that are then repeated in the literature.”

    From The evolution of sociality and the polyvagal theory (2023) · cites this paper as Burghardt et al., 2021

  • Reptiles exhibit social interactions including communal breeding, prolonged parental care, life-long monogamy, extended families, complex communication and mating systems, coordinated hunting, coordinated group movements, social learning, social play, social and self-recognition.

    “which are now known to include cases of communal breeding, complex and prolonged parental care, life-long monogamy, extended families with permanent social bonds, complex communication and mating systems, coordinated hunting, coordinated group movements, social learning, social play, social and even self-recognition”

    From The evolution of sociality and the polyvagal theory (2023) · cites this paper as Burghardt et al., 2021

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 54 · Cited by 17

Authors
Burghardt, G. M., Partin, A. M., Pepper, H. E., Steele, J. M., Liske, S. M., Stokes, A. E., Lathan, A. N., Springer, C. M., & Jenkins, M. S.
Affiliations
University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Venue
Behaviour
Published
2021-09-22
Volume
158
Issue
12-13
Pages
1169-1191
ISSN
  • 0005-7959 (ISSN-L)
  • 1568-539X
OpenAlex
W3204590510
Cited by
17
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Behaviour (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Amphibian and Reptile Biology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Keywords
Thamnophis sirtalis, diet effects, squamate reptiles, chemical communication, sex differences, tongue flicking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review