Cited by 348Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting MaterialsTactile and Sensory InteractionsSoft Robotics and Applications

Biomimetic tactile sensor array

Wettels, Nicholas, Santos, Veronica J., Johansson, Roland S., Loeb, Gerald E.·2008·Advanced Robotics

Abstract

The performance of robotic and prosthetic hands in unstructured environments is severely limited by their having little or no tactile information compared to the rich tactile feedback of the human hand. We are developing a novel, robust tactile sensor array that mimics the mechanical properties and distributed touch receptors of the human fingertip. It consists of a rigid core surrounded by a weakly conductive fluid contained within an elastomeric skin. The sensor uses the deformable properties of the finger pad as part of the transduction process. Multiple electrodes are mounted on the surface of the rigid core and connected to impedance-measuring circuitry safely embedded within the core. External forces deform the fluid path around the electrodes, resulting in a distributed pattern of impedance changes containing information about those forces and the objects that applied them. Here we describe means to optimize the dynamic range of individual electrode sensors by texturing the inner surface of the silicone skin. Forces ranging from 0.1 to 30 N produced impedances ranging from 5 to 1000 kΩ. Spatial resolution (below 2 mm) and frequency response (above 50 Hz) appeared to be limited only by the viscoelastic properties of the silicone elastomeric skin.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/156855308x314533

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Currently available prosthetic fingers have spatial resolutions on the order of 2-3 mm, while the skin has a resolution of about 1 mm.

    “Currently available prosthetic fingers have spatial resolutions on the order of 2-3 mm (Johannes et al., 2011;Wettels et al., 2008), while the skin has a resolution of about 1 mm.”

    From Biomimetic approaches to bionic touch through a peripheral nerve interface (2015) · cites this paper as Wettels et al., 2008

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 348

Authors
Wettels, N., Santos, V. J., Johansson, R. S., & Loeb, G. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Umeå University (SE)
Venue
Advanced Robotics
Published
2008-01
Volume
22
Issue
8
Pages
829-849
ISSN
  • 0169-1864 (ISSN-L)
  • 1568-5535
OpenAlex
W2031763660
Cited by
348
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 30
FWCI
9.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advanced Robotics (publishedVersion)
Funders
Alfred E. Mann Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Soft Robotics and Applications
Keywords
biomimetic tactile sensor, tactile sensor array, robotic hand, prosthetic hand, fingertip, impedance sensing, electrically conducting fluid, silicone, force sensing, viscoelasticity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review