The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogels as soft contact lens material
Abstract
A new type of soft contact lens was developed from the poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) hydrogel prepared by a low temperature crystallization technique using a water-dimethyl sulfoxide mixed solvent. The PVA contact lens materials had a water content of 78% and a tensile strength of 50 kg/cm2, five times as strong as that of commercial poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) soft contact lens. The amount of proteins adsorbed to the PVA soft hydrogel material was half to one thirtieth of that of conventional soft contact lenses. Histological and scanning electron microscopic observation of rabbit eyes which had worn the PVA soft contact lens for 12 weeks showed no difference in corneal epithelium and cell arrangement in the corneal epithelium from the non-wearing eyes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kamoun, E. A., Kenawy, E.-R. S., & Chen, X. (2017) · Journal of Advanced Research · doi:10.1016/j.jare.2017.01.005 · Cited by 1,707
Asran, A. S., Henning, S., & Michler, G. H. (2010) · Polymer · doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2009.12.046 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Hyon, S.-H., Cha, W.-I., Ikada, Y., Kita, M., Ogura, Y., & Honda, Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1994-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 397-406
- ISSN
- 0920-5063 (ISSN-L)
- 1568-5624
- OpenAlex
- W2036955760
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
