Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 506

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

In vitro evaluation of cytotoxicity of a naturally occurring cross-linking reagent for biological tissue fixation

Sung, Hsing-Wen, Huang, Rong-Nan, Huang, Lynn L.H., Tsai, Chen-Chi·1999·Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition

Abstract

A recognized drawback of the currently available chemical cross-linking reagents used to fix bioprostheses is the potential toxic effects a recipient may be exposed to from the fixed tissues and/or the residues. It is, therefore, desirable to provide a cross-linking reagent which is of low cytotoxicity and may form stable and biocompatible cross-linked products. To achieve this goal, a naturally occurring cross-linking reagent -- genipin -- which has been used in herbal medicine and in the fabrication of food dyes, was used by our group to fix biological tissues. The study was to assess the cytotoxicity of genipin in vitro using 3T3 fibroblasts (BALB/3T3 C1A31-1-1). Glutaraldehyde, the most commonly used cross-linking reagent for tissue fixation, was used as a control. The cytotoxicity of the glutaraldehyde- and genipin-fixed tissues and their residues was also evaluated and compared. The observation in the light microscopic examination revealed that the cytotoxicity of genipin was significantly lower than that of glutaraldehyde. Additionally, the results obtained in the MTT assay implied that genipin was about 10000 times less cytotoxic than glutaraldehyde. Moreover, the colony forming assay suggested that the proliferative capacity of cells after exposure to genipin was approximately 5000 times greater than that after exposure to glutaraldehyde. It was noted that the cells seeded on the surface of the glutaraldehyde-fixed tissue were not able to survive. In contrast, the surface of the genipin-fixed tissue was found to be filled with 3T3 fibroblasts. Additionally, neocollagen fibrils made by these fibroblasts were observed on the genipin-fixed tissue. This fact suggested that the cellular compatibility of the genipin-fixed tissue was superior to its glutaraldehyde-fixed counterpart. Also, the residues from the glutaraldehyde-fixed tissue markedly reduced the population of the cultured cells, while those released from the genipin-fixed tissue had no toxic effect on the seeded cells. In conclusion, as far as cytotoxicity is concerned, genipin is a promising cross-linking reagent for biological tissue fixation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/156856299x00289

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

See all 506

Metadata

Authors
Sung, H.-W., Huang, R.-N., Huang, L. L. H., & Tsai, C.-C.
Venue
Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition
Published
1999-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
63-78
ISSN
  • 0920-5063 (ISSN-L)
  • 1568-5624
OpenAlex
W1974160158
Cited by
506
References
14
FWCI
6.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In vitro evaluation of cytotoxicity of a naturally occurring cross-linking reagent for biological tissue fixation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1163/156856299x00289
The paper
Sung, H.-W., Huang, R.-N., Huang, L. L. H., & Tsai, C.-C. (1999). In vitro evaluation of cytotoxicity of a naturally occurring cross-linking reagent for biological tissue fixation. Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856299x00289

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.