Cited by 27Islamic Studies and HistoryMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, GenderGender and Feminist Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Turning the Tables: Perspectives on the Construction of “Muslim Manhood”

Abou-Bakr, Omaima·2014·Hawwa

Abstract

This article analyzes the alternative discursive strategy undertaken by Muslim women reformists, in different contexts and for different purposes, which can be described as turning the tables on Muslim men. The process involves a reversal of roles, in which women take on the religious responsibility of holding men accountable to certain Islamic ideals or ethics, judging and correcting their conduct, and demanding behavioral change. Hence, in effect, they are engaged in producing a new discourse on men in Islam, their duties and morals, as well as re-defining male identity according to Islamic ethical standards and from the perspective of Muslim women. The article also analyzes how male writers themselves conceive manhood and the characteristics of “men” in Islam. I examine three cases, arguing their correspondence to three distinctive perspectives on manhood in Islamic discourses: (a) medieval representations of the male character that concentrate on the relational dimension vis-à-vis women in the family; (b) the modernist conception of masculinity that emphasizes inherent qualities based on biological essentialism; (c) women reformists, from three different time periods, who have attempted a reconstruction of manhood and a re-definition of men as “domestic” beings by measuring them against Qurʾanic ideals and the model of the prophets.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/15692086-12341248

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Abduh, 1990, Tafsir al-manar, 12 vols
  2. Abou-Bakr, 2001, Islamic Feminism: What’s in a Name? Preliminary Reflections., AMEWS Review, 15
  3. Abou-Bakr, 2004, Surat al-rajul fi l-kitabat al-Islamiya (The image of men in medieval and modern Islamic writings)., 144
  4. Abou-Bakr, 2006, Al-niswiya al-Islamiya: Ishkaliyat al-dakhil wa-l-kharij (Islamic feminism: Internal and external problematics), Tibah, 7, 87
  5. Abou-Bakr, 2011, Khitab al-rajul min manzur Islami niswi (The address to men from an Islamic feminist perspective), Misbar, 47, 39
  6. Ali, 2004, “A Beautiful Example”: The Prophet Muhammad as a Model for Muslim Husbands., Islamic Studies, 43, 273, 10.52541/isiri.v43i2.4757 · DOI
  7. Alusi, 1994, Ruh al-maʾani fi tafsir al-Qurʾan al-ʿazim, 16 vols
  8. Boyd, 1996, Redeeming Men: Religion and Masculinities
  9. Brod, 1987, The Making of Masculinities: The New Men’s Studies
  10. Brod, 1994, Theorizing Masculinities, 10.4135/9781452243627 · DOI
  11. Connell, 1987, Gender and Power: Society, the Person and Sexual Politics
  12. Cooke, 2010, Nazira Zeineddine: A Pioneer of Islamic Feminism
  13. Elsadda, 2004, Women in the Arab World: Reading Against the Grain of Culturalism., Internationale Politik und Gesellschaft, 4, 41
  14. Ghoussoub, 2000, Imagined Masculinities: Changing Patterns of Identity for Middle Eastern Men
  15. Gilmore, 1990, Manhood in the Making: Cultural Concepts of Masculinity
  16. Hatem, 2002, Introduction, 7
  17. Hatem, 2011, Literature, Gender, and Nation-Building in Nineteenth-Century Egypt: The Life and Works of Aʾisha Taymur, 10.1057/9780230118607 · DOI
  18. Kimmel, 1987, Changing Men: New Directions in Research on Men and Masculinity
  19. Kimmel, 2004, Men and Masculinities: A Social, Cultural, and Historical Encyclopedia
  20. Krondorfer, 1996, Men’s Bodies, Men’s Gods: Male Identities in a (Post-) Christian Culture
  21. Levant, 2004, “Gender Role Strain Paradigm”., 351
  22. Mosse, 1996, The Image of Man: The Creation of Modern Masculinity, 10.1093/oso/9780195101010.001.0001 · DOI
  23. Ouzgane, 2006, Islamic Masculinities, 10.5040/9781350220881 · DOI
  24. Pleck, 1981, The Myth of Masculinity
  25. Pleck, 1995, The Gender Role Strain Paradigm: An Update., 11
  26. Pleck, 1995, Masculinity Ideologies., 129
  27. Qurtubi, 1967, al-Jamiʿ li-ahkam al-Qurʾan, 20 vols
  28. al-Razi, [1934–62], Al-tafsir al-kabir, 32 vols
  29. Sinha, 1995, Colonial Masculinity: The “Manly Englishman” and the “Effeminate Bengali” in the Late Nineteenth Century
  30. al-Tabari, 1961, Jamiʿ al-bayan ʿan taʾwil ay al-Qurʾan, 16 vols
  31. Taymur, 2002, Mirʾat al-taʾammul fi l-umur
  32. Van Klinken, 2011, Male Headship as Male Agency: An Alternative Understanding of a “Patriarchal” African Pentecostal Discourse on Masculinity., Religion and Gender, 1, 104, 10.18352/rg.19 · DOI
  33. Wilcox, 2004, Soft Patriarchy, New Men: How Christianity Shapes Fathers and Husbands
  34. Zamakhshari, 1948, Al-kashshaf, 3 vols
  35. Zayn al-Din, 1998, Al-sufur wa-l-hijab

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Abou-Bakr, O.
Corresponding author
Abou-Bakr, Omaima
Venue
Hawwa
Published
2014-06-09
Volume
11
Issue
2-3
Pages
89-107
ISSN
  • 1569-2078 (ISSN-L)
  • 1569-2086
OpenAlex
W2041209512
Cited by
27
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 18 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
4.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Hawwa (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Islamic Studies and History
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Multiculturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
masculinity, gender roles, male identity, Islamic ethics, biological essentialism, women's religious authority, domesticity, family relationships, Islamic modernism, medieval Islamic philosophy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review