Cited by 0Biblical Studies and InterpretationAugustinian Studies and TheologyKarl Barth and Christian Theology

Reception of 1 Thess. 5:23 in Irenaeus’ Philosophical Anthropology: a Diachronic Approach

McCashen, Grayden·2026·Vigiliae Christianae

Abstract

The anthropological implications of 1 Thess. 5:23 have long bemused both Paul’s interpreters and the interpreters of Paul’s earliest readers, such as Irenaeus. Though consensus has emerged on Irenaeus’ interpretation and use of 1 Thess. 5:23, certain of his passages defy the standard narrative. Taking these as a starting point, the present article employs a fresh approach by offering a diachronic reading of Irenaeus’ reception of 1 Thess. 5:23. First, it shows that Irenaeus did not express his “mature” understanding of the verse – the one which most scholars take as his normative view – until after he completed Book 2 and its various discussions of philosophical anthropology. Then, it uses insights from this diachronic analysis to offer new solutions to some of the most notoriously difficult passages amongst Irenaeus’ anthropological discussions. In so doing, it provides a more cogent reading of Against Heresies , the processes by which early Christians developed their thought, and a fresh lens for viewing one of the most widely analyzed anthropological remarks in the scriptures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/15700720-bja10119

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Authors
McCashen, G.
Affiliations
University of Notre Dame (US)
Corresponding author
McCashen, Grayden
Venue
Vigiliae Christianae
Published
2026-01-13
Volume
80
Issue
2
Pages
119-143
ISSN
  • 0042-6032 (ISSN-L)
  • 1570-0720
OpenAlex
W7124168499
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Vigiliae Christianae (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Augustinian Studies and Theology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Karl Barth and Christian Theology
Keywords
Irenaeus, philosophical anthropology, reception of Paul, Against Heresies, diachronic reading, early Christian thought, body of Christ

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review