The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Integration (of Immigrants) in the European Union: A Controversial Concept
Abstract
Integration is one of the major challenges posed to the European Union by the immigration of third-country nationals. And it is even more so in view of the mass influx of displaced persons stemming from the Russian military invasion of Ukraine. This article discusses the controversial concept of (immigrant) integration underpinned by the current EU legal and policy framework. It argues that, on the one hand, the concept of integration resulting from instruments of primary and secondary EU legislation, soft law and policy is inspired by the respect for fundamental rights and prohibition of discrimination. On the other hand, it stresses that the EU action mainly aims at preserving Member States’ sovereignty over immigration. The resulting EU normative framework for integration, including the newly adopted EU Blue Card Directive and the extension of temporary protection for Ukrainian refugees, allows and encourages the strategic selection of the most socio-economically and culturally desirable immigrants.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A range of authors pinpoint how a shift in migration rhetoric and the activation of the Temporary Protection Directive (TPD) highlight a peculiarity in how EU addresses different 'refugee crises'.
“Starting all the way from the EUlegislation perspective, a range of authors pinpoint how a shift in migration rhetoric and, specifically, the activation of the Temporary Protection Directive (TPD) highlight a peculiarity in how EU addresses different 'refugee crises' (Bosse 2022; Bottero 2022; Costello and Foster 2022; de Sousa 2022).”
From Ukrainian Refugees’ Differentiated Treatment: A Critical and Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as Bottero 2022
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ukrainian Refugees’ Differentiated Treatment: A Critical and Systematic Review
Mickelsson, T. B. (2025) · Global Networks · doi:10.1111/glob.12502 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Bottero, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Bottero, Matteo
- ORCID
- Bottero, Matteo
- Venue
- European Journal of Migration and Law
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2022-12-09
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 516-544
- ISSN
- 1388-364X (ISSN-L)
- 1571-8166
- OpenAlex
- W4313236040
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 7.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Migration and Law (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Carlsberg Foundation Young Researcher Fellowship
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › European Law and Migration
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Gender and Women's Rights
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
- Keywords
- immigrant integration, EU migration policy, third-country nationals, displaced persons, Russian invasion of Ukraine, temporary protection, Ukrainian refugees, member state sovereignty, discrimination, fundamental rights, European Union law, soft law
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review