The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Constructing a Contractualist Egalitarianism: Equality after Scanlon
Abstract
T. M. Scanlon’s work on the value of equality provides the resources for developing a powerful and distinctive contractualist egalitarian view. This view acknowledges a range of egalitarian concerns, of a diverse nature, and points us towards a picture of the place of equality in the normative landscape that is richer and more complex than some other alternative views. I describe the outlines of this contractualist egalitarian view, addressing questions regarding its strength and scope. I then discuss the relationship of equality to other values, such as fairness and community (or fraternity), and examine the contrast between contractualist egalitarian and luck egalitarian views. I conclude with a sketch of some of the practical implications that might follow from further pursuit of Scanlon’s insights on the value of equality, in the hope that this may suggest an interesting direction of travel for further work.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“If, as I do, one sees the value of equality as tied in to ideas of equal standing and status, and to a certain ideal of how people might relate to each other, it is not difficult to see how centering the value of equality can give us reason to prefer forms of interaction in which we are participants in shared institutions that themselves affirm our equal status and value, as opposed to forms of”
From Public Provision in Democratic Societies (2024) · cites this paper as O'Neill 2013
Citations
Cited by
Public Provision in Democratic Societies
O’Neill, M. (2024) · Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics · doi:10.23941/ejpe.v16i2.823 · Cited by 2
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- O’Neill, M.
- Affiliations
- University of York (GB)
- Corresponding author
- O’Neill, Martin
- ORCID
- O’Neill, Martin
- Venue
- Journal of Moral Philosophy
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 429-461
- ISSN
- 1740-4681 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-5243
- OpenAlex
- W1494865573
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 17 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Moral Philosophy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal Rights and Human Rights
- Keywords
- contractualism, egalitarianism, T. M. Scanlon, luck egalitarianism, fairness, community, fraternities, distributive justice, normative pluralism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review