Cited by 15Wildlife Ecology and ConservationAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesPlant and animal studies

Feeding ecology of the culpeo in southern Ecuador: wild ungulates being the main prey

Open access
Guntiñas, Marta, Lozano, Jorge, Cisneros, Rodrigo, Narváez, Carlos, Armijos, Jorge·2017·Contributions to Zoology

Abstract

This study details for the first time the food habits of the culpeo or Andean fox (Lycalopex culpaeus) in high areas of the Ecuadorian Andes during a complete annual cycle. Our objective was to identify prey species, calculate their contribution to diet and test for temporal variation. In total, 304 Andean fox scats were collected within the Podocarpus National Park (Loja province, southern Ecuador). By analysing the content of scats 413 prey items were identified and classified into eight prey groups. Sub-sequently, the frequency of occurrence (FO) for each prey group was calculated per month together with the relative contribution of estimated consumed biomass (CB). In addition, the Shannon-Wiener’s index was calculated as a measurement of monthly diet diversity. The results show a diet dominated by cervids belonging to the Mazama and Pudu genus (70% FO), followed by small mammals (30% FO), large rodents (12% FO), carnivorous species (10% FO) and lagomorphs (8% FO). There was temporal variation in the consumption of both deer and small mammals. Cervids also provided the major part of the consumed biomass (70% CB), the remaining prey categories each accounted for less than 11% CB. Negative correlations in consumption were observed between cervids and two other groups, rabbits and small mammals. Trophic diversity values fluctuated throughout the year showing a mean of 1.7. The results obtained show a diets very different from those previously reported; deer being the bulk of the diet instead of rodents or other mammals. The consumption of carnivorous species in the area was also high in comparison with other regions. Overall, this study clearly demonstrates that the culpeo is an important top predator in the high-Andean ecosystem.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/18759866-08602004

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Andean fox also feeds on larger mammals, including artiodactyls, large rodents, and other carnivores such as grisons and hog-nosed skunks.

    “This canid also feeds on larger mammals, including artiodactyls (Yáñez & Rau 1980;Johnson & Franklin 1994;Guntiñas et al. 2017), large rodents (Correa & Roa 2005;Guntiñas et al. 2017;Cadena-Ortíz et al. 2020), and other carnivores such as grisons, Galictis (Bell, 1826) and hog-nosed skunks, Conepatus (Gray, 1837) (Johnson & Franklin 1994;Novaro et al. 2004;Zapata et al. 2005;Palacios et al. 2012;G”

    From The Andean fox Lycalopex culpaeus (Molina, 1782) in southwestern Colombia: diet and anatomical description (2026) · cites this paper as Guntiñas et al. 2017

    The Results report deer, large rodents, and a striped hog-nosed skunk in the Andean fox’s diet. They do not report grisons as prey; the only Galictis mention found is in a reference title. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The diversity of prey identified in this sample was lower compared to studies from Ecuador, where lizards, birds, fruits, and larger mammals such as carnivores, rabbits, and ungulates have been documented.

    “However, diversity of prey identified in our sample was lower compared to studies from Ecuador, where lizards, birds, fruits, and larger mammals such as carnivores, rabbits, and ungulates have been documented (Beltrán-Ortiz et al. 2017;Guntiñas et al. 2017;Cadena-Ortiz et al. 2020).”

    From The Andean fox Lycalopex culpaeus (Molina, 1782) in southwestern Colombia: diet and anatomical description (2026) · cites this paper as Guntiñas et al. 2017

    The Results (page not provided) document birds, fruits, carnivores, rabbits, and cervids in culpeo scats from southern Ecuador. They do not document lizards in this study. The comparison with the citing authors’ own sample is their conclusion, not a finding attributed to Guntiñas et al. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In Ecuador the Andean fox has been documented preying on medium and large mammals, typically hunted by pumas.

    “In Ecuador the Andean fox has been documented preying on medium and large mammals (Trujillo-Garófolo & Trujillo-Garófolo 2007;Beltrán-Ortiz et al. 2017;Guntiñas et al. 2017;Reina-Moreno 2019;Cadena-Ortiz et al. 2020), typically hunted by pumas.”

    From The Andean fox Lycalopex culpaeus (Molina, 1782) in southwestern Colombia: diet and anatomical description (2026) · cites this paper as Guntiñas et al. 2017

    The Results report deer and other medium-sized mammals in Andean fox scats from southern Ecuador. The Discussion says park rangers observed foxes hunting deer, but it also allows that some deer meat was scavenged from carcasses left by pumas. It does not establish that the fox preyed on large mammals in Ecuador or that these mammals are typically hunted by pumas. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In Podocarpus National Park, Ecuador, deer consumption is more common, and in parts of the Atacama Desert, invertebrates' consumption is more frequent.

    “For example, in Podocarpus National Park, Ecuador, deer consumption is more common (Guntiñas et al. 2017), and in parts of the Atacama Desert, invertebrates' consumption is more frequent (Carevic et al. 2019).”
  • Ecological knowledge of the Andean fox comes mostly from dietary and population density studies in Ecuador.

    “whereas ecological knowledge comes mostly from dietary and population density studies in Ecuador (Trujillo-Garófalo & Trujillo-Garófalo 2007;Guntiñas et al. 2017;Guntiñas et al. 2019;Beltrán-Ortiz et al. 2017;Reina-Moreno 2019;Cadena-Ortiz et al. 2020).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. Achilles NT. 2007. Dieta estival del culpeo (Pseudalopex cul- paeus, Molina 1782) en Nevados de Chillán, centro-sur de Chile. M.Sc. Thesis, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias. Uni- versidad Austral de Chile, Chile.
  2. Acosta-Jamett G, Simonetti JA. 2004. Habitat use by Oncifelis guigna and Pseudalopex culpaeus in a fragmented forest landscape in central Chile. Biodiversity and Conservation, 13(6): 1135-1151.
  3. Ackerman BB, Lindzey FG, Hemker TP. 1984. Cougar food hab- its in southern Utah. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 48(1): 147-155.
  4. Arim M, Jaksic FM. 2005. Productivity and food web structure: association between productivity and link richness among top predators. Journal of Animal Ecology, 74(1): 31-40.
  5. Castro SA, Silva SI, Meserve PL, Gutierrez JR, Contreras LC, Jaksic FM. 1994. Frugivoría y dispersión de semillas de pi- miento (Schinus molle) por el zorro culpeo (Pseudalopex culpaeus) en el Parque Nacional Fray Jorge (IV Región, Chile). Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, 67(2): 169-176.
  6. Chehébar C, Martín S. 1989. Guía para el reconocimiento mi- croscópico de los pelos de los mamíferos de la Patagonia, Doñana. Acta Vertebrata, 16 (2): 247-291.
  7. Corbett LK. 1989. Assessing the diet of dingoes from feces: a comparison of 3 methods. Journal of Wildlife Management, 53: 343-346.
  8. Corley JC, Fernandez GJ, Capurro AF, Novaro AJ, Funes MC, Travaini A. 1995. Selection of cricetine prey by the culpeo fox in Patagonia: a differential prey vulnerability hypothesis. Mammalia, 59(3): 315-326.
  9. Correa P, Roa A. 2005. Relaciones tróficas entre Oncifelis guig- na, Lycalopex culpaeus, Lycalopex griseus y Tyto alba en un ambiente fragmentado de la zona central de Chile. Mastozo- ología neotropical, 12(1): 57-60.
  10. De Barba M, Adams JR, Goldberg CS, Stansbury CR, Arias D, Cisneros R, Waits LP. 2014. Molecular species identification for multiple carnivores. Conservation Genetics Resources, 6(4): 821-824.
  11. De Oliveira TG, Pereira JA. 2014. Intraguild predation and inter- specific killing as structuring forces of carnivoran communi- ties in South America. Journal of Mammalian Evolution, 21(4), 427-436.
  12. Delibes-Mateos M, de Simon JF, Villafuerte R, Ferreras P. 2008. Feeding responses of the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) to different wild rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) densities: a regional ap- proach. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 54: 71-78.
  13. Donadio E, Buskirk SW, Novaro AJ. 2012. Juvenile and adult mortality patterns in a vicuña (Vicugna vicugna) population. Journal of Mammalogy, 93(6): 1536-1544.
  14. Ebensperger LA, Mella JE, Simonetti JA. 1991. Trophic-niche relationships among Galictis cuja, Dusicyon culpaeus, and Tyto alba in central Chile. Journal of Mammalogy, 72(4): 820-823.
  15. Fugger B. 1979. Zur Ernährung Sbiologie Und Taxonomie Des Andenfuchses, Dusicyon Culpaeus (Molina, 1882) Im Pe- ruanischen Hochland. 1979. M.Sc. Thesis. Diplomarbeit Fakultat Fûr Biologie. Ruprecht-Karl-Universitat. Heidel- berg.
  16. Guzmán-Sandoval J, Sielfeld W, Ferrú M. 2007. Dieta de Lyca- lopex culpaeus (Mammalia: Canidae) en el extremo norte de Chile (Región de Tarapacá). Gayana, 71(1): 1-7.
  17. Halter DF. 1967 Some aspects in the ecology of the black bear (Ursus americanus) in interior Alaska. M.Sc. Thesis. Univ. of Alaska, Fairbanks.
  18. Iriarte JA, Jiménez JE, Contreras LC, Jaksic FM. 1989. Small- mammal availability and consumption by the fox, Dusicyon culpaeus, in central Chilean scrublands. Journal of Mam- malogy, 70(3): 641-645.
  19. Jaksic FM, Schlatter RP, Yáñez JL. 1980. Feeding ecology of central Chilean foxes, Dusicyon culpaeus and Dusicyon gri- seus. Journal of Mammalogy, 61(2): 254-260.
  20. Jaksic FM, Jiménez JE, Castro SA, Feinsinger P. 1992. Numeri- cal and functional response of predators to a long-term de- cline in mammalian prey at a semi-arid Neotropical site. Oecologia, 89(1): 90-101.
  21. Jiménez JE, Novaro AJ. 2004. Culpeo (Pseudalopex culpaeus). In: Sillero-Zubiri, C., Hoffmann, M., Macdonald, D.W. (Eds.), Canids: Foxes, Wolves, Jackals and Dogs. Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan. IUCN/SCC Canid Specialist Group, Gland and Cambridge. pp. 44-49.
  22. Jiménez JE, Lucherini M, Novaro AJ. 2008. Pseudalopex cul- paeus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2008: e. T6929A12816382. In: http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK. 2008.RLTS.T6929A12816382. Downloaded on 12 Novem- ber 2016. · DOI
  23. Johnson WE, Franklin WL. 1994. Role of body size in the diets of sympatric gray and culpeo foxes. Journal of Mammalogy, 75(1): 163-174.
  24. Juarez KM, Marinho-Filho J. 2002. Diet, habitat use, and home ranges of sympatric canids in central Brazil. Journal of Mammalogy, 83(4): 925-933.
  25. Maldonado DE, Pacheco LF, Saavedra LV. 2014. Legitimidad en la dispersión de semillas de algarrobo (Prosopis flexuosa, Fabaceae) por zorro andino (Lycalopex culpaeus, Canidae) en el Valle de La Paz (Bolivia). Ecología en Bolivia, 49(2): 93-97. Contributions to Zoology, 86 (2) -2017
  26. Malo AF, Lozano J, Huertas DL, Virgós E. 2004. A change of diet from rodents to rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Is the wildcat (Felis silvestris) a specialist predator? Journal of Zo- ology, 263(04): 401-407.
  27. Malo AF, Godsall B, Prebble C, Grange Z, McCandless S, Tay- lor A, Coulson T. 2013. Positive effects of an invasive shrub on aggregation and abundance of a native small rodent. Be- havioral Ecology, 24 (3): 759-767.
  28. Marquet PA, Contreras LC, Torresmura J, Silva SI, Jaksic FM. 1993. Food habits of Pseudalopex foxes in the Atacama De- sert, pre-Andean ranges, and the high-Andean plateau of northernmost Chile. Mammalia, 57(1): 131-135.
  29. Medel R, Jaksic FM. 1988. Ecología de los cánidos sudamerica- nos: una revisión. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, 61(1): 67-79.
  30. Meserve PL, Shadrick EJ, Kelt DA. 1987. Diets and selectivity of two Chilean predators in the northern semi-arid zone. Re- vista Chilena de Historia Natural, 60(1): 93-99.
  31. Novaro AJ, Funes MC, Walker RS. 2000. Ecological extinction of native prey of a carnivore assemblage in Argentine Pa- tagonia. Biological Conservation, 92(1): 25-33.
  32. Novaro AJ, Funes MC, Walker RS. 2005. An empirical test of source-sink dynamics induced by hunting. Journal of Ap- plied Ecology, 42(5): 910-920.
  33. Novaro AJ, Moraga CA, Briceño C, Funes MC, Marino A. 2009. First records of culpeo (Lycalopex culpaeus) attacks and co- operative defense by guanacos (Lama guanicoe). Mamma- lia, 73(2), 148-150.
  34. Lozano J, Moleón M, Virgós E. 2006. Biogeographical patterns in the diet of the wildcat, Felis silvestris Schreber, in Eurasia: factors affecting the trophic diversity. Journal of Biogeogra- phy 33(6): 1076-1085.
  35. Lozano J, Virgós E, Cabezas-Díaz S. 2013. Monitoring Europe- an wildcat populations using scat surveys in central Spain: Are population trends related to wild rabbit dynamics or to landscape features? Zoological Studies, 52(1): 16.
  36. Pacheco LF, Lucero A, Villca M. 2004. Dieta del puma (Puma concolor) en el Parque Nacional Sajama, Bolivia y su con- flicto con la ganadería. Ecología en Bolivia, 39(1): 75-83.
  37. Palacios R, Walker RS, Novaro AJ. 2012. Differences in diet and trophic interactions of Patagonian carnivores between areas with mostly native or exotic prey. Mammalian Biology- Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde, 77(3): 183-189.
  38. Pia MV, López MS, Novaro AJ. 2003. Efectos del ganado sobre la ecología trófica del zorro culpeo (Pseudalopex culpaeus smithersi) (Carnivora: Canidae) endémico del centro de Ar- gentina. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, 76(2): 313-321.
  39. Pia MV. 2013. Trophic interactions between puma and endemic culpeo fox after livestock removal in the high mountains of central Argentina. Mammalia, 77(3): 273-283.
  40. Putman RJ. 1984. Facts from faeces. Mammal Review, 14(2), 79-97.
  41. Ripple WJ, Estes JA, Beschta RL, Wilmers CC, Richie EG, Heb- blewhite M, Berger J, Elmhagen B, Letnic M, Nelson MP, Schmitz OJ, Smith DW, Wallach AD, Wirsing AJ. 2014. Sta- tus and ecological effects of the world's largest carnivores. Science, 343 (6167): 1241484.
  42. Reynolds JC, Aebischer NJ. 1991 Comparison and quantification of carnivore diet by faecal analysis: a critique, with recom- mendations, based on a study of the fox Vulpes. Mammal Review, 21(3): 97-122.
  43. Richter M. 2003. Using Epiphytes and Soil Temperatures for Eco-Climatic Interpretations in Southern Ecuador (Der Nutzen von funktionalen Pflanzentypen und Bodentempera- turen für klimaökologische Interpretationen in Süd-Ecua- dor). Erdkunde, 57(3): 161-181.
  44. Romo MC. 1995. Food habits of the Andean fox (Pseudalopex culpaeus) and notes on the moutain cat (Felis colocolo) and puma (Felis concolor) in the Rio Abiseo National Park, Peru. Mammalia, 59(3): 335-344.
  45. Rosellini S, Barja I, Piñeiro A. 2008. The response of the Euro- pean pine marten (Martes L.) feeding to the changes of small mammal abundance. Polish Journal of Ecology, 56:497-504.
  46. Rubio AV, Alvarado R, Bonacic C. 2013. Introduced European rabbit as main prey of the native carnivore culpeo fox (Ly- calopex culpaeus) in disturbed ecosystems of central Chile. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment, 48(2): 89-94.
  47. Shannon CE, Weaver W. 1949. The mathematical theory of in- formation. Univ. Illinois Press. Urbana.
  48. Sillero-Zubiri C, Hoffmann M, Macdonald DW. (Eds.). 2004. Canids: foxes, wolves, jackals and dogs: status survey and conservation action plan. IUCN.
  49. Silva SI, Bozinovic F, Jaksic FM. 2005. Frugivory and seed dis- persal by foxes in relation to mammalian prey abundance in a semiarid thornscrub. Austral Ecology, 30(7): 739-746.
  50. Stucchi M, Figueroa J. 2010. Descripción de las interacciones tróficas entre el cóndor andino Vultur gryphus y otras espe- cies por el consumo de carroña en el cañón del Colca, Are- quipa. Boletín Informativo de la Unión de Ornitólogos de Perú, 5(2): 8-14.
  51. Tirira D. 2011. Lobo de Páramo (Pseudalopex culpaeus). Pp. 215-216, en: Libro Rojo de los mamíferos del Ecuador (D.G. Tirira, ed.), 2a. edición. Fundación Mamíferos y Conserva- ción, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador y Ministe- rio del Ambiente del Ecuador. Quito.
  52. Walker RS, Novaro AJ, Perovic P, Palacios R, Donadio E, Lucherini M, López MS. 2007. Diets of three species of An- dean carnivores in high-altitude deserts of Argentina. Jour- nal of Mammalogy, 88(2): 519-525.
  53. Zacari MÁ, Pacheco LF. 2005. Depredación vs. problemas sani- tarios como causas de mortalidad de ganado camélido en el Parque Nacional Sajama. Ecología en Bolivia, 40(2): 58-61.
  54. Zapata SC, Travaini A, Delibes M, Martínez-Peck R. 2005. Food habits and resource partitioning between grey and culpeo foxes in southeastern Argentine Patagonia. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment, 40(2): 97-103. Received: 7 September 2016 Revised and accepted: 19 April 2017 Published online: 19 July 2017 Editor: V.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guntiñas, M., Lozano, J., Cisneros, R., Narváez, C., & Armijos, J.
Affiliations
Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja (EC)
Venue
Contributions to Zoology
Published
2017-07-19
Volume
86
Issue
2
Pages
169-180
ISSN
  • 0067-8546 (ISSN-L)
  • 1383-4517
  • 1875-9866
OpenAlex
W2763592097
Cited by
15
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3
FWCI
1.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bijdragen tot de Dierkunde (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Multilingual Matters (Channel View Publications) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • The Digital Academic Repository of Naturalis Biodiversity Center (Naturalis Biodiversity Center) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • The Digital Academic Repository of Naturalis Biodiversity Center (Naturalis Biodiversity Center) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja
  • Ministry of Environment
  • Secretaría de Educación Superior, Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación
  • Universidad San Francisco de Quito
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant and animal studies
Keywords
Lycalopex culpaeus, Andean fox, feeding ecology, diet composition, scat analysis, wild ungulates, deer, Mazama, Pudu, small mammals, trophic diversity, top predators, high Andean ecosystems, Podocarpus National Park

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review