Cited by 7Middle East and Rwanda ConflictsArab Spring and North African PoliticsSocial Media and Politics

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Ctrl-Alt-Revolt?: Online and Offline Networks during the 2011 Egyptian Uprising

Nugent, Elizabeth R., Berman, Chantal E.·2018·Middle East Law and Governance

Abstract

Analyses of the 2011 Egyptian uprising assign a significant mobilizing role to the interpersonal networks created through Facebook and Twitter. However, these studies fail to investigate online networks in comparison with more traditional “offline” networks, which are similarly theorized to mobilize members to protest participation. In this paper, we analyze nationally representative Arab Barometer survey data from Egypt 2011 to compare the mobilizing effects of memberships in four different types of networks: online, union, community, and religious. We test whether these networks were distinct and operated in competition, or overlapping and operated in tandem to mobilize Egyptians to protest. We demonstrate that different networks mobilized different segments of the population, consistent with theories about the negative revolutionary coalition necessary for successful uprisings. We also show that multiple network membership increases protest propensity, and that individuals at the intersection of online networks and community group networks, such as those formed through membership in charity groups or sports clubs, are most likely to engage in revolutionary protest. These results speak to an important interactive effect between online and offline networks in terms of facilitating successful revolutionary uprisings.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/18763375-01001007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 7

Metadata

Authors
Nugent, E. R., & Berman, C. E.
Affiliations
  • Middle East Institute (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Nugent, Elizabeth R.
  • Berman, Chantal E.
Venue
Middle East Law and Governance
Published
2018-03-28
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
59-90
ISSN
  • 1876-3367 (ISSN-L)
  • 1876-3375
OpenAlex
W2806532248
Cited by
7
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Middle East Law and Governance (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Arab Spring and North African Politics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
Keywords
Egyptian revolution, social networking sites, Facebook, Twitter, protest mobilization, union membership, community networks, religious networks, Arab Barometer, social movements, Egypt

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review