Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 4Theological Perspectives and PracticesGender and Feminist StudiesFeminist Theory and Gender Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Violence of Essentialism

Open access
Khan, Abeera·2021·Religion and Gender

Abstract

During the 2017 London Pride parade, the Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain (cemb) marched with placards emblazoned with slogans such as “Islam is homophobic,” “Allah is gay,” “End Islamic Hatred and Violence to Gays”, “Islamophobia is an oxymoron” and “East London Mosque incites murder of lgbts” (Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain 2017a). The organisation is the British branch of the Central Council of Ex-Muslims, a German association representing formerMuslims or “apostates”. cemb are a self-described group of “non-believers, atheists, and ex-Muslims” committed to “taking stand for reason, universal rights, and secularism” (Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain 2017b). Deliberately provocative, the intervention was made in the name of lgbt people subjugatedby anti-homosexuality lawsby countries under “Islamic rule” andbyMuslim homophobia in the UK. More broadly, cemb’s political mobilisations are motivated by their staunch belief of the threat that Islam in particular poses to universal rights, particularly women and lgbt rights. There are obvious queer feminist criticisms to be made of cemb’s articulations of queer secularity (Khan 2020), the questionable locations of homophobia (Rao 2014), and the exceptionalisation of gendered, homophobic and sexualised violence within the amorphous “Muslim community” (El Tayeb 2013; Farris 2017; Haritaworn 2015; Puar 2017). I want to forgo this line of critique and dwell instead on the essentialisms at the heart of this mobilisation of the religion/secular divide: the politics it effects and precludes. What can the violence of essentialism— both the violence it fixates on and the violence it inflicts—reveal about the relationship between religion and gender? I suggest that investigating essentialist mobilisations of religion and gender, not as analogy nor as comparison but as relational politics, may complicate our analyses of gender, religion, and their interconnections. The following year, another spectacle unravelled at the same setting, one under a different political register but bearing kindred essentialist claims. A lesbian group,Get the LOut, carried banners stating slogans such as “transactivism erases lesbians” and protesting alleged “anti-lesbianism” (Gabbatiss 2018). The

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/18785417-bja10004

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

See all 4

Metadata

Authors
Khan, A.
Affiliations
SOAS University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Khan, Abeera
Venue
Religion and Gender
Published
2021-06-23
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
99-104
ISSN
  • 1878-5417 (ISSN-L)
  • 2589-8051
OpenAlex
W3173617173
Cited by
4
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2
FWCI
0.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Religion and Gender (publishedVersion)
  • SOAS Research Online (SOAS University of London) (acceptedVersion)
  • SOAS Research Online (SOAS University of London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Theological Perspectives and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
Keywords
essentialism, violence, gender essentialism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Violence of Essentialism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1163/18785417-bja10004
The paper
Khan, A. (2021). The Violence of Essentialism. Religion and Gender. https://doi.org/10.1163/18785417-bja10004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.