Cited by 4Historical, Religious, and Philosophical StudiesBiblical Studies and InterpretationReligious Studies and Spiritual Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Spirit, Soul and Body in Nag Hammadi Literature: Distinguishing Anthropological Schemes in Valentinian, Sethian, Hermetic and Thomasine Texts

Open access
Roig Lanzillotta, Lautaro·2017·Gnosis

Abstract

A close analysis of the views on man in the Nag Hammadi texts reflects that the tripartite pattern distinguishing three elements in the human being (intellect or spirit, soul and body), even if majoritarian, is not the only one at work in the corpus: there is also a group of texts reflecting rather a bipartite scheme discriminating between soul and body only. Irrelevant though it may seem, this difference is seminal, since it not only implies a different psychology, or theory of the soul, but also a different cosmology, which in its turn also involves a dissimilar soteriology or theory concerning man’s salvation. The present study, the first in a series of five, provides a first and general approach that intends to establish the existence of these two differentiated anthropological patterns in the Nag Hammadi corpus. Following studies will offer a more detailed and separate analysis of the textual evidence, assessing the anthropological frameworks behind the different textual groups allegedly found in the corpus, namely the Valentinian, Sethian, Hermetic and Thomasine texts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/2451859x-12340025

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Annas Julia Hellenistic Philosophy of the Mind 1992 Berkeley University of California Press
  2. Armstrong A. Hilary Blumenthal H.J. Robinson Henry Lloyd A.C. “Aristotle in Plotinus. The Continuity and Discontinuity of Psyche and Nous” Aristotle and the Later Tradition 1991 Oxford Oxford University Press 117 127
  3. Bonazzi Mauro Helmig Christoph Platonic Stoicism, Stoic Platonism: The Dialogue between Platonism and Stoicism in Antiquity 2007 Leuven Leuven University Press
  4. Bovon François “The Soul’s Come Back: Immortality and Resurrection in Early Christianity” Harvard Theological Review 2010 103 387 406
  5. Bremmer Jan N. The Early Greek Concept of the Soul 1983 Princeton, N.J. Princeton University Press
  6. Burkert Walter Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagorism 1972 Cambridge Harvard University Press
  7. Burkert Walter Collins A.Y. “Towards Plato and Paul: The ‘Inner’ Human Being” Ancient and Modern Perspectives on the Bible and Culture. Essays in Honor of Hans Dieter Betz 1998 Atlanta Scholars Press 59 82
  8. Diels Hermann Doxographi Graeci: Collegit recensuit prolegomenis indicibusque instruxit Hermannus Diels 1965 Ed.: Editio quarta Berolini De Gruyter
  9. Dillon John The Middle-Platonists 1996 rev. ed. Ithaca, NY Cornell University Press
  10. Dodds Eric R. Proclus. The Elements of Theology 1963 Oxford Clarendon Press
  11. Dunning Benjamin H. Koosed Jennifer L. “Tripartite Anthropologies and the Limits of the Human in Valentinian Christian Creation Myths” The Bible and Posthumanism 2014 Atlanta Society of Biblical Literature Press 175 197
  12. Emilsson Eyjolfur K. “Platonic Soul-Body Dualism in the Early Centuries of the Empire to Plotinus” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt. II.36.7 1994 Berlin De Gruyter 5331 5362
  13. Engberg-Pedersen Troels Cosmology and Self in the Apostle Paul: The Material Spirit 2010 Oxford University Press
  14. Gersh Stephen Middle Platonism and Neoplatonism: the Latin Tradition 1986 vol 1 Notre Dame University of Notre Dame Press
  15. Gill Christopher Bonazzi Mauro Helmig Christoph “Marcus Aurelius’ Meditations: How Stoic and How Platonic?” Platonic Stoicism, Stoic Platonism 2007 Leuven Leuven University Press 189 206
  16. Hamilton William “The Myth in Plutarch’s De genio (589f–592e)” Church Quarterly 1934 28 175 182
  17. Heckel Theo K. Wright John P. Potter Paul “Body and Soul in Saint Paul” Psyche and Soma: Physicians and Metaphysicians on the Mind-Body Problem from Antiquity to Enlightenment 2002 Oxford Clarendon Press 117 131
  18. Inwood Brad Bonazzi Mauro Helmig Christoph “Seneca, Plato and Platonism: the Case of Letter 65” Platonic Stoicism and Stoic Platonism 2008 Leuven Leuven University Press 149 167
  19. King Karen L. What is Gnosticism? 2003 Cambridge Harvard University Press
  20. Kulawik Cornelia Die Erzählung über die Seele 2006 Berlin De Gruyter Nag-Hammadi-Codex ii,6
  21. Layton Bentley Robinson William C. Layton Bentley “The Expository Treatise on the Soul” Nag Hammadi Codex II,2–7 Vol. 2. together with XIII, 2*, Brit. Lib. Or.4926(1), and P.OXY. 1, 654, 655: with contributions by many scholars, Vol. 2: On the Origin of the World, Expository Treatise on the Soul, Book of Thomas the Contender 1989 Leiden Brill 135 169
  22. Layton Bentley The Gnostic Treatise on Resurrection from Nag Hammadi 1979 Missoula, MT Scholars Press [orig. Diss. Harvard 1971]
  23. Layton Bentley Layton Bentley “The Hypostasis of the Archons” Nag Hammadi Codex II, 2–7 1989 Vol. 1 Leiden Brill 220 259
  24. Martin Dale B. The Corinthian Body 1995 New Haven Yale University Press eBook Academic Collection (EBSCOhost)
  25. Merlan Philip Armstrong A.H. “Greek Philosophy from Plato to Plotinus” The Cambridge History of Later Greek and Early Medieval Philosophy 1967 Cambridge Cambridge University Press 14 132
  26. Meyer M.W. The Letter of Peter to Philip: Text, Translation and Commentary 1981 Chico, CA Scholars Press
  27. Moraux Paul Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen. Von Andronikos bis Alexander von Aphrodisias vol. I: Die Renaissance des Aristotelismus im I Jh v. Chr 1973 Berlin De Gruyter
  28. Moraux P. Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen, II: Von Andronikos bis Alexander von Aphrodisias 1984 Berlin De Gruyter
  29. Neher M. Wesen und Wirken der Weisheit in der Sapientia Salomonis 2004 Berlin De Gruyter
  30. Nock Arthur D. Festugière André-Jean Corpus Hermeticum, i: Traités I–XII; ii: Traités XIII–XVIII; Asclépius; iii–iv: Fragments extraits de Stobée (I–XXIX); Fragments divers 1960 Vol. 1 and 2 Paris Société d’Edition “Les Belles Lettres”
  31. Nussbaum Martha C. The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics 1994 Princeton Princeton University Press
  32. Peel Malcolm Zandee Jan Pearson Birger “The Teachings of Silvanus” Nag Hammadi Codex VII 1996 Leiden Brill 249 369
  33. Reese James M. Hellenistic Influence on the Book of Wisdom and Its Consequences 1970 Rome Biblical Institute Press
  34. Rist John M. Meyer Ben F. Sanders Ed Parrish “Are You A Stoic? The Case of Marcus Aurelius” Jewish and Christian Self-Definition, vol. 3: Self-Definition in the Graeco-Roman World 1982 London SCM 23 45
  35. Robinson Thomas M. Plato’s Psychology 1995 Toronto Toronto University Press
  36. Robinson Thomas M. Wright John P. Potter Paul “The Defining Features of Mind-Body Dualism in the Writings of Plato” Psyche and Soma: Physicians and Metaphysicians on the Mind-Body Problem from Antiquity to Enlightenment 2002 Oxford Oxford University Press 37 56
  37. Roig Lanzillotta Lautaro Meeussen Michiel Van der Stock Luc “Plutarch’s Anthropology and its Influence on His Cosmological Framework” Aspects of Plutarch’s Natural Philosophy 2015 Leuven University Press 175 195
  38. Thomassen Einar Karlsen S.T. Økland J. “Valentinian Ideas about Salvation as Transformation” Metamorphoses: Resurrection, Body, and Transformative Practices in Early Christianity 2009 Berlin De Gruyter 169 186
  39. Trapp Michael Maximus The Philosophical Orations 1997 Oxford etc. Clarendon Press

Metadata

Authors
Roig Lanzillotta, L.
Affiliations
University of Groningen F.L.Roig.Lanzillotta@rug.nl
Venue
Gnosis
Published
2017-03-22
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
15-39
ISSN
  • 2451-8581 (ISSN-L)
  • 2451-859X
OpenAlex
W2602162734
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Gnosis Journal of Gnostic Studies (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
Keywords
Nag Hammadi texts, Gnosticism, anthropology of the human, soul, body, cosmology, soteriology, salvation, Hermetic texts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spirit, Soul and Body in Nag Hammadi Literature: Distinguishing Anthropological Schemes in Valentinian, Sethian, Hermetic and Thomasine Texts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1163/2451859x-12340025
The paper
Roig Lanzillotta, L. (2017). Spirit, Soul and Body in Nag Hammadi Literature: Distinguishing Anthropological Schemes in Valentinian, Sethian, Hermetic and Thomasine Texts. Gnosis. https://doi.org/10.1163/2451859x-12340025