Cited by 0Indigenous Cultures and HistoryMilitary history and social perspectivesColonialism, slavery, and trade

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.

The Pequot War

Calloway, Colin G·2017·The SHAFR Guide Online

Abstract

This book offers the first full-scale analysis of the Pequot War (1636-37), a pivotal event in New England colonial history. Through an innovative rereading of the Puritan sources, Alfred A. Cave refutes claims that settlers acted defensively to counter a Pequot conspiracy to exterminate Europeans. Drawing on archaeological, linguistic, and anthropological evidences to trace the evolution of the conflict, he sheds new light on the motivations of the Pequots and their Indian allies. He also provides a reappraisal of the interaction of ideology and self- interest as motivating factors in the Puritan attack on the Pequots.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/2468-1733_shafr_sim020070057

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
Calloway, C. G.
Corresponding author
Calloway, Colin G
Venue
The SHAFR Guide Online
Published
2017-10-02
OpenAlex
W4244652646
Cited by
0
References
0
Type
reference entry
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The SHAFR Guide Online (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Military history and social perspectives
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Colonialism, slavery, and trade
Keywords
Pequot War, Pequot, Native American warfare, colonial New England, English colonial expansion, Native American resistance, 17th century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review