The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 24 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
“THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE.“ XU CISHU'S BIOGRAPHY
Open accessAbstract
L'articolo "'The Brush-Rest and the Tea Stove': Xu Cishu's Biography" di Livio Zanini tratta la biografia di Xu Cishu (1547-1604), letterato di Hangzhou autore del Chashu (Trattato sul tè, 1597). La prima parte raccoglie le informazioni introduttive sulle fonti relative a tale autore disponibili, sulla base delle quali è stato possibile tracciare la sua biografia. Figlio di un funzionario e dotato per le lettere, Xu Cishu non intraprese la carriera amministrativa, forse a causa di un suo handicap fisico. Nel corso della sua vita si trovò spesso in difficoltà economiche fu costretto a svolgere diversi lavori che lo portarono a viaggiare lontano dalla sua città natale. Xu Cishu era buon amico di Feng Mengzhen e conosceva Tu Long e altri eminenti letterati dell'area del Jiangnan. Nella parte dedicata alle opere di Xu Cishu viene offerta una descrizione del suo Chashu e si cerca di fare luce sulla sua origine. Il tè il particolare modo in cui veniva consumato era un elemento distintivo dei letterati e divenne oggetto di grande interesse all'interno della letteratura dedicata propri dello stile di vita dell'élite che caratterizza l'ultima parte della dinastia Ming. Il testo di Xu è interamente dedicato a tale bevanda ed è basato prevalentemente sulla sua esperienza personale e su quella di suoi amici e altri esperti di tè. L'ultima parte dell'articolo offre la traduzione integrale del necrologio dedicato a Xu Cishu e delle due prefazioni al suo trattato.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
22 No basis given · 21 Not checked yet · 20 Sources not found · 17 Own interpretation · 16 Own result
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The paragraph “Xu Ranming” in the first juan of Dongcheng Zaji (Miscellaneous Notes from the Eastern Quarter) by Li E (1692-1752).15”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Sources on Xu Cishu's Life
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Li E's Qing biography accurately draws its information from KXTJ.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“The figure of Xu Cishu drew considerable attention after the erroneous dating of his death and of the composition of the CS by Nakamura Takashi and Nunome Chofu.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Nakamura Takashi
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Nunome Chofu
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It has been possible to find 25 episodes where Xu Cishu appears.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Sources on Xu Cishu's Life
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Feng Mengzhen's diary accurately records events and dates involving Xu Cishu.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This study will take into account all of the sources on Xu Cishu, which include his epitaph, the two prefaces, the text and the postscript of the CS, the letters and diary by Feng Mengzhen, as well as a short biography composed during the Qing dynasty.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Introduction
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“even in the rare cases in which temporal indications are present in the letters, it was not possible to single out corresponding references in the diary.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Sources on Xu Cishu's Life
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Feng Mengzhen's diary accurately records events and dates involving Xu Cishu.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Of the four sons of Xu Yingyuan, Cishu was the only one to inherit his father's predisposition for literary studies.36”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Xu Cishu's Biography
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Feng Mengzhen's epitaph reliably records facts about Xu Cishu's life.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To stay afloat, he had to carry out irregular jobs that required him to travel once or twice a year to distant provinces.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Xu Cishu's Biography
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Feng Mengzhen's epitaph reliably records facts about Xu Cishu's life.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The treatise on tea is the only one of his works that is preserved today.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Works
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“among whom a few experts on tea stand out, such as Feng Mengzhen, Tu Long and Xu Gui”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Conclusion
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The biographical and textual sources used (epitaph, prefaces, gazetteers, diaries) are reliable enough for the paper's historical reconstruction and dating.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“We know that he was in Shangdong for a period of time to serving as a companion or tutor under the patronage of a high-ranking figure.42”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Xu Cishu's Biography
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Feng Mengzhen's epitaph reliably records facts about Xu Cishu's life.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 53
- It may state two separate claims as one. 43
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Xu Cigong Ranming Muzhiming (Xu Cigong Ranming's Epitaph), 4 written by Feng Mengzhen 5 (1548-1605) 6 .”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Sources on Xu Cishu's Life
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: Feng Mengzhen's epitaph reliably records facts about Xu Cishu's life.
In the paper
“diary kept by Feng Mengzhen with irregular frequency between 1587 and 1605.13 This script is contained in juans 47-62 of KXTJ.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Sources on Xu Cishu's Life
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites KXTJ
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Feng Mengzhen's diary accurately records events and dates involving Xu Cishu.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Li E drew most of his information for the Xu Cishu biography from KXTJ, adding some personal comments.16”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Sources on Xu Cishu's Life
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites KXTJ
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Li E's Qing biography accurately draws its information from KXTJ.
- Not matched
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This work dates to 1728 and contains annotations on people and places in the eastern quarter of Hangzhou, where both the author and Xu Cishu lived.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Sources on Xu Cishu's Life
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Li E's Qing biography accurately draws its information from KXTJ.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Within the CS and the author's postscript there are many passages with autobiographical information.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Sources on Xu Cishu's Life
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: The Chashu and its postscript provide reliable autobiographical information about Xu Cishu.
In the paper
“The only modern biographical dictionary that has an item on Xu Cishu is Mingren Zhuanji Ziliao Suoyin (from here on MRSY), which reports a few facts drawn from his obituary that was written by Feng Mengzhen.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Introduction
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites MRSY
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“They are personal communications written in a fairly laconic style and relating to facts unknown to us.These letters are not dated.14”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Sources on Xu Cishu's Life
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Feng Mengzhen's diary accurately records events and dates involving Xu Cishu.
In the paper
“The CSQJ (Complete Collection of the Treatises on Tea), compiled by Yu Zheng in 1613.It is the first collection of texts specifically dedicated to tea.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Sources on Xu Cishu's Life
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites CSQJ
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“This text dates to the period between the end of 1604 and Feng's death 7 , and is contained in juan 13 of Kuaixue Tang Ji (from here on KXTJ), a collection of Feng Mengzhen's scripts published in 1616.8”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Sources on Xu Cishu's Life
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites KXTJ
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Feng Mengzhen's epitaph reliably records facts about Xu Cishu's life.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As the author never undertook a career in government, however, the information we have on his life is rather sparse.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Introduction
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This preface is dated “spring of the year dingwei” (1607) and is contained in all editions of CS.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Sources on Xu Cishu's Life
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The two prefaces to the Chashu reliably report facts about Xu Cishu and the text.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“all studies done to present take into account only a portion of the documents concerning this writer and none offers an in-depth and comparative analysis of the sources.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Introduction
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the only piece of Xu's writing that survives”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Introduction
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The epitaph is concerned mainly with moral and intellectual virtues of Xu, but also contains important information about his life and family.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Sources on Xu Cishu's Life
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Feng Mengzhen's epitaph reliably records facts about Xu Cishu's life.
In the paper
“Six letters from Feng Mengzhen to Xu Cishu contained in the section “Epistles” (chidu ) of KXTJ (juans 32-44).”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Sources on Xu Cishu's Life
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites KXTJ
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: Feng Mengzhen's diary accurately records events and dates involving Xu Cishu.
- Not matched
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Feng Mengzhen's diary illustrates the omnipresence of tea in the daily life of scholars at the time and the weight of the exchange of information on it.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Conclusion
boostedcorrelationalSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The biographical and textual sources used (epitaph, prefaces, gazetteers, diaries) are reliable enough for the paper's historical reconstruction and dating.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“During the period when Feng was in Hangzhou, Xu Cishu spent much time with him, joining him on boating excursions on the Eastern Lake, visiting the numerous sanctuaries scattered about the surrounding hills, and, on a few occasions, travelling to other cities of Jiangnan.40”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Xu Cishu's Biography
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Feng Mengzhen's diary accurately records events and dates involving Xu Cishu.
In the paper
“The compilers of Siku Quanshu Zongmu Tiyao, while recognising the CS to be extremely accurate in its treatment of the methods of harvesting, conserving, and preparing tea, maintained that upon close examination there were numerous inaccuracies and that the author made an error in the identification of an ancient spring.62”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Works
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Siku Quanshu Zongmu Tiyao
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Xu Cishu (zi: Ranming ) was born in 1549.34”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Xu Cishu's Biography
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: Feng Mengzhen's epitaph reliably records facts about Xu Cishu's life.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Feng Mengzhen's epitaph (which indicates a date of death of 1605)”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Works
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: The biographical and textual sources used (epitaph, prefaces, gazetteers, diaries) are reliable enough for the paper's historical reconstruction and dating.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“The oldest editions available are that in the CSQJ (1613) with the title Chashu, and that in the BYTMJ (1620) with the title Xu Ranming Xiansheng Chashu.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Works
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites CSQJ
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites BYTMJ
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“The dates of Xu's death and of the composition of the CS have been subjects of debate following arguments put forward by Nakamura Takashi and Nunome Chofu.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Works
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Nakamura Takashi
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Nunome Chofu
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Xu Cishu developed a strong preference for the writings of the taoist philosopher Zhuang Zi, even adopting the nickname (hao) Nanhua , from a title attributed to the thinker in the early years of the Tang dynasty.37”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Xu Cishu's Biography
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Feng Mengzhen's epitaph reliably records facts about Xu Cishu's life.
In the paper
“The work is divided into four sections, where 25 titles are collected, from the Chajing by Lu Yu (Cf.infra, note 96) to the treatises slightly preceding his compilation, to which are attached a fifth section with a paper composed by Yu Zheng himself.The CS is contained in the fourth section.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Sources on Xu Cishu's Life
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites CSQJ
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Feng himself was also an esteemed connoisseur of the drink.59”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Works
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Presumably around his twentieth year he married a woman nee Ping , who died a few years later, around 1574, and of whom was born his only son, Xu Zhaonan .”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Xu Cishu's Biography
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Feng Mengzhen's epitaph reliably records facts about Xu Cishu's life.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The text contains about 4,500 characters and consists of one juan, subdivided into 36 paragraphs (each with its own title) with a postscript by the author.55”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Works
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“According to his own statements in the CS, he visited Hebei, Shandong, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Jiangxi, Hunan, Guizhou, Yunnan, and Guangdong.41”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Xu Cishu's Biography
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites CS
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: The Chashu and its postscript provide reliable autobiographical information about Xu Cishu.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Feng Mingzhen -who already knew Xu Cishu's cousins Pingyu and Lingci , sons of Xu Yingheng -described him as a “famous scholar” of Hangzhou following their first meeting in 1589.39”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Xu Cishu's Biography
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: Feng Mengzhen's diary accurately records events and dates involving Xu Cishu.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“After more than a century, Li E bestowed upon the CS one of the highest compliments, stating that “it arrives to seize the essence of tea and is complementary to Lu Yu's Chajing.”61”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Works
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of Xu Cishu's non-literary interests, we know only of his passion for collecting oddly shaped rocks (qishi ) 48 and of that for tea.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Xu Cishu's Biography
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: Feng Mengzhen's epitaph reliably records facts about Xu Cishu's life.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“During the last of his trips, he accidentally fell into a body of water, almost drowning.Upon returning to Hangzhou, he decided never to leave again.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Xu Cishu's Biography
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Feng Mengzhen's epitaph reliably records facts about Xu Cishu's life.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The revenues that Xu Cishu gained from his employment were quickly and regularly exhausted within a period of a few months.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Xu Cishu's Biography
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: Feng Mengzhen's epitaph reliably records facts about Xu Cishu's life.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Xu Cishu addresses practically all aspects of the production and consumption of tea in a systematic way, and is the first to discuss some of the important innovations in tea-drinking that had developed in the course of the dynasty.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Works
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the CS was the first and only of his works to be published.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Conclusion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The biographical and textual sources used (epitaph, prefaces, gazetteers, diaries) are reliable enough for the paper's historical reconstruction and dating.
In the paper
“The later editions are found within the following congshu (Cf.Wan 1958, n. 58): Jujia Bibei, Xinshang Bian, Guang Baichuan Xuehai, Xu Shuofu (only the first ten paragraphs), Gujin Tushu Jicheng (incomplete), Shuobu Congshu, Congshu Jicheng.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Works
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Wan 1958
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In contrast, it seems that he generally abstained from consuming alcoholic drinks.52”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Xu Cishu's Biography
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: Feng Mengzhen's epitaph reliably records facts about Xu Cishu's life.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“yet at the beginning of the eighteenth century, Li E tells us that they have already been lost.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Works
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: Li E's Qing biography accurately draws its information from KXTJ.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The first edition, which has been lost, was edited by Xu Shiqi in 1607.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Works
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Xu Cishu acquired a certain notoriety for his literary style, and moved among circles of the Hangzhou elite.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Xu Cishu's Biography
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Feng Mengzhen's epitaph reliably records facts about Xu Cishu's life.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The two brothers were among the most well-known scholars in Hangzhou during the Jiajing reign (1522-1566) and became known as “the two Xus”.20”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Xu Cishu's Biography
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The branch of the Xu clan, to which Xu Cishu belonged, settled in Hangzhou six generations before him, after leaving the Dong'an district in Hebei.17”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Xu Cishu's Biography
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“A few years later, the text was republished in CSQJ and then later within other collectanea.60”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Works
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites CSQJ
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We know that he left behind two collections of writings under the titles Xiaopin Shi Ji (Collection of the Hall of Treatises) and Dangzhi Zhai Ji (Collection from the Studio of the Comb and Washbasin).”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Works
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: Feng Mengzhen's epitaph reliably records facts about Xu Cishu's life.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Bao died around 1552 -when Cishu was only three -afterwards Madam Zhang (? -1603), his father's second wife and the mother of his younger brothers, took up caring for him.35”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Xu Cishu's Biography
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Feng Mengzhen's epitaph reliably records facts about Xu Cishu's life.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The resulting text was completed in 1597, when Cishu showed it to his friend Xu Shiqi, a year after their holiday in Longjing.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Works
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Xu Cishu's house was located in south-east of Hangzhou, close to the city walls, a few hundred meters south of where the city's train station is located”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Xu Cishu's Biography
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: Feng Mengzhen's epitaph reliably records facts about Xu Cishu's life.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Like his father, he was well-versed in the poetic styles of shi and ci.53”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Works
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: Feng Mengzhen's epitaph reliably records facts about Xu Cishu's life.
In the paper
“Xu could boast of a deep and recognised experience in this field and, in the postscript of the CS, affirms that he always had -apart from his love for literary composition -a strong passion for tea, to the point of always bringing with him “the brush-rest and the tea stove”.51”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Xu Cishu's Biography
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites CS
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The Chashu and its postscript provide reliable autobiographical information about Xu Cishu.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Tea appears in many references to meetings between Xu Cishu and Feng Mengzhen.50”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Xu Cishu's Biography
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: Feng Mengzhen's diary accurately records events and dates involving Xu Cishu.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The first two outstanding figures in the family, registered as popular class, 18 were the father of Cishu, Xu Yingyuan (1506-1565; zi: Zichun ; hao: Mingshan ) and his younger brother, Xu Yingheng (hao: Shiwu ).”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Xu Cishu's Biography
plainn = 2- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The version in the CSQJ is without the preface by Xu Shiqi, but is more reliable with regards to the text.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Works
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites CSQJ
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“He was the second child of Yingyuan, and the last one he had by his first wife, Bao .”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Xu Cishu's Biography
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Feng Mengzhen's epitaph reliably records facts about Xu Cishu's life.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“They earned the title of jinshi in 1532 and 1544, respectively, 19 qualifying within just over a decade of each other.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Xu Cishu's Biography
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Throughout his life, Xu Cishu was constantly running into financial difficulties, partly due to his extravagant tastes.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Xu Cishu's Biography
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Feng Mengzhen's epitaph reliably records facts about Xu Cishu's life.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Xu Cishu died at home on October 7, 1604.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Xu Cishu's Biography
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: Feng Mengzhen's epitaph reliably records facts about Xu Cishu's life.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In his preface to the CS, Xu Shiqi reports that in 1607 Huang Ruheng (1558-1626) 54 was preparing to publish these two collections”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Works
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: The two prefaces to the Chashu reliably report facts about Xu Cishu and the text.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Today, the text is considered one of the most important and representative texts on tea of the Ming period.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Works
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Xu Cishu was certainly a prolific writer and his works include both prose and poetry.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Works
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Feng Mengzhen's epitaph reliably records facts about Xu Cishu's life.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Xu Cishu's Treatise on Tea is considered one of the most representative works on the subject from the Ming dynasty and it distinguishes itself from other contemporary texts through the thoroughness and originality of its content.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Introduction
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“As acutely pointed out by Craig Clunas, the consumption of luxury goods and engagement in refined pastimes assumed a key position in the socio-economic dynamics that emerged in the late Ming period.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Conclusion
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Craig Clunas
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“An understanding the origins of the CS, helps us to comprehend and appreciate its contents, as well as place it among the writings of the period.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Conclusion
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“Xu Cishu is accused of confusing the well found on top of Mount Jinshan (in the city of Zhenjiang, Jiangsu) with the ancient spring of Zhongling.Actually, the author of CS expresses his correct perplexity about the identification of the well with the famous ancient spring, believing it to have disappeared as a result of changes in the terrain.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Works
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Siku Quanshu Zongmu Tiyao
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“we must remember the incorrectness of the compilers about the number of chapters of CS”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Works
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites note 55
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Furthermore, information regarding other minor figures active in Hangzhou at the end of the sixteenth century can be brought to light.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Conclusion
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“The end of the Ming dynasty was characterised by a great interest on the part of the Jiangnan elite in the collection of art work and antiques as well as in the consumption of luxury goods.45”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Xu Cishu's Biography
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Clunas 1991
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Clunas 1996
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“He was handicapped, however, and it was probably due to his physical impairment that he never entered into a career in civil service.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Xu Cishu's Biography
hedgedconditionalSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Feng Mengzhen's epitaph reliably records facts about Xu Cishu's life.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Xu Cishu's friendship with Feng Mengzhen, his acquaintance with Tu Long (1542-1605), 46 and most likely with Gao Lian 47 -the latter two authors of two of the most significant works dedicated to the “things” proper of the elite lifestyleplaces him in the milieu of the literati most involved in this kind of matters.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Xu Cishu's Biography
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Among these people, we can first identify his father, whose hao Mingshan (Tea mountain) let us suppose that Cishu inherited his passion for tea from him, and then Feng Mengzhen and several people who were a part of his entourage: Yao Bodao, who in his preface to the CS claims to have passed to Xu Cishu all his knowledge of tea; Tu Long, author of Chajian ; 56 Xu Gui , 57 mentioned in the KXTJ as a”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Works
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Until now, all the treatises on this drink, as well as books written on other material goods, have been considered almost a subproduct of official literature, merely the fruits of literati pastimes.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Conclusion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this regard, the CS presents the most accurate subdivision among all the treatises on tea from the Ming dynasty.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Works
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Through an analysis of the biographic sources of Xu Cishu, it is possible to construct an image of his life, filling in an omission common to all the major biographic indexes of the Ming epoch and to the studies on the history of tea.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Conclusion
hedgeddirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The biographical and textual sources used (epitaph, prefaces, gazetteers, diaries) are reliable enough for the paper's historical reconstruction and dating.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This largely biographical study makes evident the importance of a revaluation of the enormous body of texts dedicated to tea in all its aspects, for their value as sources on daily life and material culture in the Ming period.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Conclusion
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“According to the title of one of his collections, we can suppose that he named his studio Dangzhi zhai (Studio of the Comb and Washbasin).”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Xu Cishu's Biography
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this attitude, we can perceive the strong discrimination that many late Ming writings endured in the course of the compilation of the SKQS during the following dynasty, and that, in many ways, has shaped the general approach to the study of Chinese literary heritage.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Conclusion
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The wife would have died around 1574, when Xu Cishu was only 25.”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Tomb inscription for Xu Cishu Ranming
hedgedSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The biographical and textual sources used (epitaph, prefaces, gazetteers, diaries) are reliable enough for the paper's historical reconstruction and dating.
The paper relies on this without support.
Feng Mengzhen's epitaph reliably records facts about Xu Cishu's life.
“When not otherwise specified, the facts on Xu Cishu's life are from Feng's Epitaph.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Feng Mengzhen's diary accurately records events and dates involving Xu Cishu.
“diary kept by Feng Mengzhen with irregular frequency between 1587 and 1605.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Chashu and its postscript provide reliable autobiographical information about Xu Cishu.
“Within the CS and the author's postscript there are many passages with autobiographical information.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The two prefaces to the Chashu reliably report facts about Xu Cishu and the text.
“This preface is dated “spring of the year dingwei” (1607) and is contained in all editions of CS.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Li E's Qing biography accurately draws its information from KXTJ.
“Li E drew most of his information for the Xu Cishu biography from KXTJ, adding some personal comments.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The biographical and textual sources used (epitaph, prefaces, gazetteers, diaries) are reliable enough for the paper's historical reconstruction and dating.
“Through an analysis of the biographic sources of Xu Cishu, it is possible to construct an image of his life”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Works
“Huang Ruheng (1558-1626)”
§ "THE BRUSH-REST AND THE TEA STOVE > Works
“Huang Ruheng (zi: Zhenfu ; 1558-1620)”
Citations
Cites
A Dictionary of Official Titles in Imperial China
Teng, S. Y., & Hucker, C. O. (1986) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/1858260 · Cited by 556
Eminent Chinese of the Ch'ing Period (1644-1912).
Michael, F., & Hummel, A. W. (1944) · The Far Eastern Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2049036 · Cited by 314
Superfluous Things: Material Culture and Social Status in Early Modern China
Spence, J. D., & Clunas, C. (1995) · Design Issues · doi:10.2307/1511620 · Cited by 293
Dictionary of Ming Biography, 1368-1644
Soper, A. C., Goodrich, L. C., & Fang, C. (1979) · Artibus Asiae · doi:10.2307/3249541 · Cited by 128
The Chia-ching reign, 1522–1566
Geiss, J. (1988) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/chol9780521243322.010 · Cited by 41
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Hu Kemin (ed.), The Spirit of Gongshi: Chinese Scholar's Rocks, Newton, L. H. Inc, 1998.
- Hummel, Arthur W. (ed.). Eminent Chinese of the Ch'ing Period, Washington DC, 1943-44, Government Printing Office (reprint: Taibei, Smc Publishing, 1991).
- Meng Qing'en and Yu Liangzi "Chashu" (Treatises on tea) in Zhongguo Chajing, ed. by Chen Zongmao, Shanghai Shanghai Wenhua Chubanshe, 1992, pp. 595-600.
- Mowry, Robert. D., "Chinese Scholar Rocks: An Overview" in Worlds Within Worlds, ed. by Mowry, Robert. D., Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard University Art Museums, 1997.
- ---, "Xu Cishu de Chashu" (Xu Cishu's 'Treatise on Tea': Chinese version of the paper presented to 1990 Hangzhou International Conference on Tea Culture). In Cha de Lishi yu Wenhua, ed. by Wang Jiayang, Hangzhou, Sheying Chubanshe, 1991, pp. 171-77.
- Wan Guoding , "Chashu Zongmu Tiyao" (Annotated catalogue of treatises on tea), in Xu 1990, pp. 11-76. Originally published in Nongye Yichan Yanjiu Jikan, n. 2, 1958, pp. 205-39.
- Wang He , "Xu Cishu Chashu Chengshu Niandai he Zuozhe de Shengzu Nian" (Dates of completion of Xu Cishu's 'Treatise on Tea' and of it's author's birth and death), in Zhongguo Cha Wenhua Jingdian ed. by Chen Binfan, Beijing, Guangming Ribao Chubanshe, 1999, pp. 825-26.
- Wenshizhe Chubanshe (ed.), Ming-Qing Jinshi Timing Beilu Suoyin (Index to the commemorative steles for jinshi degree holder from the Ming and Qing dynasties), Taibei, Wenshizhe Chubanshe, 1982.
- Wu Zhihe , "Shende Mingke Zhi Li de Chashu" (Chashu, a text that succeed in understanding tea till its principle), in Zhongguo Chayi Luncong, ed. by Wu Zhihe, Taibei, Dali Chubanshe, 1985, pp. 411-14. Originally published in Taiwan Ribao Fukan, 13-6-1980.
- Xu Xianyao (ed.), Zhongguo Chashu Tiyao (Annoted catalogue of Chinese treatises on tea), Taibei, Boyuan Chuban, 1990.
- Xie Wenbai , "Guzhu Gongchayuan" (The imperial tea garden in Guzhu), Lu Yu Cha Wenhua Yanjiu, n. 1 (1991), pp. 131-132.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Compiling and Publishing in Late Ming Fuzhou: The Case of the CHASHU 茶書
Zanini, L. (2024) · Ming Studies · doi:10.1080/0147037x.2024.2398369
Self-citationGao, X. (2026) · Journal of International Ceramic Studies · doi:10.1016/j.joics.2026.06.002
Metadata
- Authors
- Zanini, L.
- Corresponding author
- Zanini, Livio
- ORCID
- Zanini, Livio
- Venue
- Ming Qing yanjiu
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2002-02-06
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 123-152
- ISSN
- 1724-8574 (ISSN-L)
- 2468-4791
- OpenAlex
- W2884522603
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Ming Qing Yanjiu (publishedVersion)
- ARCA (Università Ca' Foscari Venezia) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Biographical and Historical Analysis
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Historical and Literary Analyses
- Keywords
- tea treatises, Ming literati, Jiangnan literati, tea consumption, literati lifestyle, Ming dynasty, preface, funeral oration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-04, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-04 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
