Cited by 3Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesTeacher Education and AssessmentsTeacher Professional Development and Motivation

Mentoring Practices in Secondary Schools: Perceptions of Mentors and Pre-service Teachers in Mozambique

Open access
David, Carlos, Kim, Chankook·2023·Innovation and Education

Abstract

In teacher preparation programs, mentoring is fundamental in helping pre-service teachers develop teaching competencies for their future careers. Usually, despite its relevance, the mentoring program is not undertaken accordingly during school placements. Focusing on mentoring practices, the study aimed to explore perceptions of pre-service teachers from Rovuma University and their mentors of mentoring program during practicum in two public secondary schools, in Montepuez town—Mozambique, and understand how these practices impact pre-service teachers’ (pst s) professional identity and their future profession. An exploratory sequential mixed-methods design was employed in this study. Quantitative and qualitative data were analyzed and interpreted using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis methods. The results revealed that some mentor teachers were supportive; they gave orientations and feedback to their assigned student teachers. Due to the personal efforts and mentor support, some pre-service teachers increased their confidence—improvement in knowledge delivery, relationship with learners and peers, cognitive knowledge, and self-awareness. Nonetheless, not all mentor teachers were supportive or provided adequate guidance to their student teachers. As a result, some student teachers had to handle teaching independently and were not adequately trained as they should have been. Similarly, the result showed that the practicum duration was perceived as relatively short by…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/25248502-bja00002

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • David and Kim (2023) found that some mentor teachers in Mozambique secondary schools were supportive and gave orientation and feedback to pre-service teachers, leading to improved knowledge delivery; however, not all mentor teachers were supportive, and some student teachers had to teach independently.

    “Also, David and Kim (2023) conducted a study Int J Edu Sci, 51(1): 1-11 (2025) on mentoring practices in Mozambique secondary schools.The study found that some mentor teachers were supportive, and they gave orientation and feedback to the pre-service teachers that they were mentoring.Consequently, some of those pre-service teachers showed an improved knowledge delivery in their classrooms.However,”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
David, C., & Kim, C.
Venue
Innovation and Education
Published
2023-12-22
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
54-80
ISSN
2524-8502 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4412899264
Cited by
3
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 3
FWCI
2.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Innovation and Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Professional Development and Motivation
Keywords
mentoring, pre-service teachers, student teaching practicum, teacher education curriculum, professional identity, teaching competencies, mentor support, practicum duration, secondary schools, Mozambique

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review