Cited by 0Indian and Buddhist StudiesChinese history and philosophyStudy and Philosophy of Religion

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Introduction to the First Issue of the Journal of Chan Buddhism: East Asian and Global Perspectives

Open access
_, _·2020·Journal of Chan Buddhism

Abstract

Japan, and Korea focused on cutting-edge research across many disciplines concerning the religious traditions of Chinese Chan, Japanese Zen,

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/25897179-12340007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Citations

Metadata

Authors
_, _.
Corresponding author
_, _
Venue
Journal of Chan Buddhism
Published
2020-12-22
Volume
1
Issue
1-2
Pages
1-2
ISSN
  • 2589-7160 (ISSN-L)
  • 2589-7179
OpenAlex
W4246844307
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Chan Buddhism (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
Keywords
Zen Buddhism, East Asian Buddhism, Japanese Buddhism, Korean Buddhism, Chinese Buddhism, Buddhist studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-04 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review