Cited by 8Historical Astronomy and Related StudiesChinese history and philosophyHistory and Theory of Mathematics

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Use of the Twenty-eight Xiu as a Day-Count in Early China

Kalinowski, Marc·1996·East Asian Science, Technology, and Medicine

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/26669323-01301005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 8

Metadata

Authors
Kalinowski, M.
Corresponding author
Kalinowski, Marc
Venue
East Asian Science, Technology, and Medicine
Published
1996-07-05
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
55-81
ISSN
  • 1562-918X (ISSN-L)
  • 2666-9323
OpenAlex
W2533771524
Cited by
7
References
0
Citations by year
2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
East Asian Science Technology and Medicine (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Historical Astronomy and Related Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › History and Theory of Mathematics
Keywords
Chinese calendar, lunisolar calendar, ancient China, calendar reform

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review