The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Scribal Training in Old Babylonian Susa
Abstract
This chapter gives an overview of the curricular approach of scribal education as attested in the school tablets found in Susa. The school tablets from Susa are a case study for an education in a multicultural social context. The influence of the Mesopotamian school system on the scribal education in Susa seems to have been so significant that Elamite played almost no role in the scholastic context investigated here. The sequence of the stages of scribal education is clearly traceable, but the curricular material itself shows striking differences. It reveals that the Mesopotamian curriculum was not just blindly adopted but that it underwent a significant adjustment to fit the linguistic environment of Susa. The study of the educational corpus from Susa uncovered many, but not all features of the curriculum and process of scribal education at Susa. Keywords:educational corpus; Elamite; Mesopotamian curriculum; scribal education; Susa
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“All these prove beyond doubt that Susa was an integral part of Mesopotamian writing culture .”
From The Susa Funerary Texts: A New Edition and Re-Evaluation and the Question of Psychostasia in Ancient Mesopotamia (2019) · cites this paper as Malayeri 2013: 368
In the citing paper
“Only two Elamite deities are attested in this corpus: Inšušinak and d Tu-zi .”
From The Susa Funerary Texts: A New Edition and Re-Evaluation and the Question of Psychostasia in Ancient Mesopotamia (2019) · cites this paper as Malayeri 2013: 372
In the citing paper
“Interestingly, as shown by Malayeri (2013: 372), most of the divine names in the Susa school tablets are Sumerian, with a preponderance of deities from Lagaš and Ur .”
From The Susa Funerary Texts: A New Edition and Re-Evaluation and the Question of Psychostasia in Ancient Mesopotamia (2019) · cites this paper as Malayeri 2013: 372
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wasserman, N. (2019) · Journal of the American Oriental Society · doi:10.7817/jameroriesoci.139.4.0859 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Malayeri, M.
- Corresponding author
- Malayeri, Mehrnoush
- Venue
- Susa and Elam. Archaeological, Philological, Historical and Geographical Perspectives
- Publisher
- BRILL
- Published
- 2013-01-01
- Pages
- 365-375
- OpenAlex
- W2500443981
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 18 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- BRILL eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Ancient Near East History
- Social Sciences › Education › Historical Education Studies Worldwide
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
- Keywords
- scribal training, Old Babylonian period, Susa, Elamite language, curriculum adaptation, scribal schools
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
