The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sins and Sinners: Perspectives from Asian Religions
Abstract
Asian religious traditions have always been deeply concerned with "sins" and what to do about them. As the essays in this volume illustrate, what Buddhists in Tibet, India, China or Japan, what Jains, Daoists, Hindus or Sikhs considered to be a "sin" was neither one thing, nor exactly what the Abrahamic traditions meant by the term. "Sins"could be both undesireable behavior and unacceptable thoughts. In different contexts, at different times and places, a sin might be a ritual infraction or a violation of a rule of law; it could be a moral failing or a wrong belief. However defined, sins were considered so grave a hindrance to spiritual perfection, so profound a threat to the social order, that the search for their remedies through rituals of expiation, pilgrimage, confession, recitation of spells, or philosophical reflection, was one of the central quests of the religions studied here.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As Phyllis Granoff (2012: 203 -4) aptly puts it, Aj ā ta ś atru is ' both vilified, as the ultimate sinner who killed his father and conspired against the Buddha, and glorified as the greatest devotee of the Buddha, whose faith in the Buddha was so extraordinary that his ministers had to prevent him from dying with grief on hearing the news of the Buddha ' s death. '”
From The Buddhist salvation of Ajātaśatru and the Jaina non-salvation of Kūṇika (2019) · cites this paper as Granoff 2012: 203 -4
In the citing paper
“Some medieval Jaina story collections, such as Uddyotana ' s Kuvalayam ā l ā (dated 779 CE) and Ā mradeva ' s Ā khy ā nakama ṇ iko ś av ṛ tti , contain various narrative illustrations of the efficacy of remorse and confession in cleansing sin.”
From The Buddhist salvation of Ajātaśatru and the Jaina non-salvation of Kūṇika (2019) · cites this paper as Granoff 2012: 187 -8
In the citing paper
“The story of Aj ā ta ś atru in T. 374 bears striking resemblances to the story of Yudhi ṣṭ hira in the Śā ntiparvan of the Mah ā bh ā rata (see Granoff 2012).”
From The Buddhist salvation of Ajātaśatru and the Jaina non-salvation of Kūṇika (2019) · cites this paper as Granoff 2012
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
The Buddhist salvation of Ajātaśatru and the Jaina non-salvation of Kūṇika
Wu, J. (2019) · Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies · doi:10.1017/s0041977x19000272 · Cited by 3
Prayer and Buddhism? The Supreme Offering
Teiser, S. F. (2022) · Journal of the American Academy of Religion · doi:10.1093/jaarel/lfad004 · Cited by 3
Zhao, W. (2023) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel14030410 · Cited by 1
Wu, J. (2014) · International Journal of Asian Studies · doi:10.1017/s1479591414000138
Theology and Qualitative Research
Lam, S. (2022) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119756927.ch47
Vasubandhu 世親 (ca. 320–400 CE) as a Putative Pure Land Patriarch in Chinese and Japanese Buddhism
Keyworth, G. A. (2026) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel17010117
Metadata
- Authors
- Granoff, P., & Shinohara, K.
- Venue
- BRILL eBooks
- Publisher
- BRILL
- Published
- 2012-08-17
- OpenAlex
- W2490906358
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 1.44
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- BRILL eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
- Keywords
- sin, sinners, Jainism, Daoism, Hinduism, Sikhism, pilgrimage, confession, incantations, moral failing, spiritual perfection, social order, comparative religion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.