Cited by 315

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Logistics of the Roman Army at War (264 B.C. - A.D.235)

Roth, Jonathan·1999

Abstract

Relying on a variety of literary, documentary and archaeological sources, this work explores the Roman military supply system from the Punic Wars to the end of the Principate. Each chapter is devoted to a different aspect of logistics: supply needs and rations; packs, trains and military servants; foraging and requisition; supply lines; sources of supply; administration; and the impact of logistics on Roman warfare. As a whole the book traces the development of the Roman logistics into a highly sophisticated supply system - a vital element in the success of Roman arms. In addition, it makes a critical study of important technical questions of Roman logistics, such as the size of the soldier's grain ration, the function of military servants, and the changes in logistical management under the Republic and Empire.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/9789004236325

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the absence of maritime and/or riverine transport, Roman armies moved food, water, weapons and other supplies by porters, pack-animals and animal-drawn carts such as mules, horses and cattle.

    “In the absence of maritime and/or riverine transport, food, water, weapons, and the other supplies required by armies were moved by porters, pack-animals and animal-drawn carts such as mules, horses and cattle (Roth, 1999, pp. 198-222).”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Roth, J.
Publisher
BRILL
Published
1999-01-01
Cited by
315
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review