The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Confucianism as Religion: Controversies and Consequences
Abstract
Confucianism as Religion tackles the perennially controversial question of whether Confucianism is a religion. After surveying the epistemological difficulties in both Chinese and Western scholarship in addressing the controversy over Confucian religiosity, Yong Chen convincingly reveals the sociopolitical and cultural stakes that are deeply entangled with the controversy. He brings the issue to the scrutiny of the latest theoretical constructions in religious studies and anthropology and, by defying Wilfred C. Smith’s claim that it is a question that the West has never been able to answer and China never been able to ask, proposes a holistic and contextual approach to the question about the religious status of Confucianism.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The idea of China as the source of orthodoxy had been generally accepted during the late Chos ŏ n period and was established in close connection to the development of Neo-Confucian ideas such as ''orthodox tradition of the way'' (Ch. daotong 道 統 ), a discourse of determining the line of Confucian figures as transmitters of the true way, while excluding others accused of propagating heterodox teach”
From The Re-emergence of Chosŏn Buddhism in the 17th Century: A Question of Institutional Development and Legitimation (2019) · cites this paper as Chen 2013, 136
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kim, S.-E. T. (2019) · Journal of Korean Religions · doi:10.1353/jkr.2019.0011 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, Y.
- Corresponding author
- Chen, Yong
- ORCID
- Chen, Yong
- Venue
- BRILL eBooks
- Publisher
- BRILL
- Published
- 2013-01-01
- OpenAlex
- W2383089700
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 1.68
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- BRILL eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Keywords
- Confucianism, epistemology of religious studies, anthropology of religion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review